Joan Laporta

[jamrock]

You have serious reading comprehension issues

The last 15 years in EPL, many times before a season begun, no one had a clue which 2 or 3 would contend until the end for the title. many examples: 14/15, 15/16, 16/17, 17/18, 23/24, 24/25, this season

Between 18 and 22, Liverpool and City made it a clear 2 horse race because they became the two best teams in the world with substantial distance from the third. Something like Barca and Madrid in the Pep Vs Mourinho years

On the contrary, in LL the last 20 years, you know its either Barca or Madrid 95% of the times, and there is a 5% where both have a bad season, when you know Atleti will be the one getting the chance.
That means in plain English the league is not competitive, if you know beforehand who will win it

AGAIN: Even a 10yr old would understand that you can't compare league titles when there is such difference in competitiveness. There is no point in discussing with someone who doesn't get the basic fact that you can't compare apples with oranges

PS: It's laughable that you even think Atleti achieved the same as Liverpool.
Flip it around. Had Klopp took over Barca or Madrid in 2015 instead of Pool, he would have gotten 7 or 8 leagues in 9 years in the farmers LL
Levels...

So basically only 2/3 teams were in the title race in the EPL just like la liga.

Thanks for confirming.

Liverpool the teams you twerk about consistently, is being matching be lowly atletico madrid and their nepotism

 

[Birdy]

So basically only 2/3 teams were in the title race in the EPL just like la liga.

Thanks for confirming.

I did not say something even remotely close to that.

But no surprise you are so poor in reading comprehension.

 

[jamrock]

I did not say something even remotely close to that.

But no surprise you are so poor in reading comprehension.

Yes you did, tip tapping around obvious facts. But facts are hard to deny, so you could only do so much.

2-3 teams have been capable of winning the EPL period. That's a fact.

Atleti started from a lower position, and have more or less matched Liverpool's achievements, despite all this talk of a model club and how great they are, the return has been lacking, also a fact.

But maybe the 400m they spent this summer will finally change that.

 

[Birdy]

Yes you did, tip tapping around obvious facts. But facts are hard to deny, so you could only do so much.

2-3 teams have been capable of winning the EPL period. That's a fact.

Atleti started from a lower position, and have more or less matched Liverpool's achievements, despite all this talk of a model club and how great they are, the return has been lacking, also a fact.

But maybe the 400m they spent this summer will finally change that.

I will write it one last time:
Atleti won LL titles, not EPLs.
Atleti could not win any EPL the last 20 years, not even the one Leicester won in 2016, if somehow tranferred to EPL. Barca and Madrid post 2015 could only win not more than 1 or 2 EPL titles the last 10 years.

Klopp's Liverpool, on the contrary, would win all LLs between 2018 and 2022, if somehow transferred to LL.

There is nothing more to be said to show that you can't compare any LL title to any EPL title.
If you can't understand that basic fact, then you are clueless about football. Sorry to break it to you

Don't have time to waste on someone who can't comprehend such basic stuff given in plain English