TornAndFrayed
Banned
Yea. Madrid, (and RM) is probably drinking to all of barça's problem, but the main culprits are catalan. This board handed the people who want to hurt barça a loaded gun.
So Blatter is a corrupt man? He sits there and getting corrupt all by himself? Corruption means collusion with others and others means people who have money and power to make profit for Blatter. Therefore his buddy Perez is the best candidate provide food for corruption. Those "unfortunate" comments about Ronaldo gave Blatter green light to re-open BdO re-elections. No one remembers what he said about Ronaldo(if there was anything offensive at all) but everyone remembers Ronaldo getting his BdO, which attention to RM, favor to Perez. So if that old man is trying to maintain his power- it is done by the likes of Perez and other powerful people who scratch each others back and do favors for each other. The real funny thing here is that you are acknowledging that Blatter is corrupt and trying to maintain power but you refuse to see that it requires partners in crime . And last but not least: Every club and especially major clubs can be subjected to sanctions for violating something. Most of the regulation is in grey zone and FIFA or LFP officials can hammer you anytime they want.Does that really make him a RM fan hellbent on sabotaging FCB? How exactly has Blatter helped RM? We have been more successful during his time as a FIFA president.
Blatter is an old and corrupt man that is more worried about maintaining power. I don't think that he cares about the Spanish league let alone watching FCB and RM on a weekly basis.
Also was it not Blatter who made that "unfortunate" (in his position at least) comment about Ronaldo?
In any case whatever RFEF and LFP are doing domestically FIFA has no or at least very little say about.
The undeniable fact is also that all the problems/scandals/unrest in the club are bound in the incompetence of our board first and foremost. I am not sure how much evidence some members need to see to finally realize the ground reality.
So Blatter is a corrupt man? He sits there and getting corrupt all by himself? Corruption means collusion with others and others means people who have money and power to make profit for Blatter. Therefore his buddy Perez is the best candidate provide food for corruption. Those "unfortunate" comments about Ronaldo gave Blatter green light to re-open BdO re-elections. No one remembers what he said about Ronaldo(if there was anything offensive at all) but everyone remembers Ronaldo getting his BdO, which attention to RM, favor to Perez. So if that old man is trying to maintain his power- it is done by the likes of Perez and other powerful people who scratch each others back and do favors for each other. The real funny thing here is that you are acknowledging that Blatter is corrupt and trying to maintain power but you refuse to see that it requires partners in crime . And last but not least: Every club and especially major clubs can be subjected to sanctions for violating something. Most of the regulation is in grey zone and FIFA or LFP officials can hammer you anytime they want.
So Blatter is a corrupt man? He sits there and getting corrupt all by himself? Corruption means collusion with others and others means people who have money and power to make profit for Blatter. Therefore his buddy Perez is the best candidate provide food for corruption. Those "unfortunate" comments about Ronaldo gave Blatter green light to re-open BdO re-elections. No one remembers what he said about Ronaldo(if there was anything offensive at all) but everyone remembers Ronaldo getting his BdO, which attention to RM, favor to Perez. So if that old man is trying to maintain his power- it is done by the likes of Perez and other powerful people who scratch each others back and do favors for each other. The real funny thing here is that you are acknowledging that Blatter is corrupt and trying to maintain power but you refuse to see that it requires partners in crime . And last but not least: Every club and especially major clubs can be subjected to sanctions for violating something. Most of the regulation is in grey zone and FIFA or LFP officials can hammer you anytime they want.
Well to Bartomeu for keeping Lucho when vast majority of fans wanted him gone.
Since same old clownish and corrupt candidates will run yet again in elections, Bartomeu could very well be the safest choice.
One season and everything is forgotten and forgiven. I hope not.
Bartomeu actually done more than few things to rectify some of Rosell's mistakes and it's overboard to label him as corrupt as Rosell. Laporta was corrupt too, if you wanna look at it that way.
I really don't like other candidates that much. Most of them are clowns and would waste years before they learn how to run a club.
All I'm saying is Bartomeu staying ain't the worst option.
Yeah, except Laporta has never been indicted for tax fraud and all the supposed charges Rosell and Bartomeu laid on him were dismissed by the court.
People seriously have such short memories and/or are such prisoners of the moment?
Reminder, Bartomeu has been indicted for tax fraud and could face jail-time. You seriously want the president of your club to undergo a public trial for fraud while he is presiding your club?
Come on now.
Yeah, except Laporta has never been indicted for tax fraud and all the supposed charges Rosell and Bartomeu laid on him were dismissed by the court.
People seriously have such short memories and/or are such prisoners of the moment?
Reminder, Bartomeu has been indicted for tax fraud and could face jail-time. You seriously want the president of your club to undergo a public trial for fraud while he is presiding your club?
Come on now.
We are gonna win the treble. So automatically everything is forgotten. Right?
Bartomeu has not been found guilty of tax fraud yet and even then it was not for personal gain but apparently misguided attempt to lessen the tax paid on Neymar transfer as advised by those from financial sector.
Lets wait and see how that pans out.
Only recently Laporta has been in media about using club money to spy on players and club officials. He has tried to put the club on tours that he would directly make money from, he has apparently put his mistress on the payroll of Barca, paid with prostitutes on his club credit card, taken hundreds tickets meant for fans in CL finals, used club money to pay for over 100 U2 concert tickets etc!
For me Laporta ran club more for personal gain while Bartomeu has possibly been part of a misguided effort to save the club money based on outside advice.
If you are comparing Laporta v Bartomeu on who sought more personal gain from being president of Barca there is only one winner.