11 - Raphinha

[draconifire]

 

[Maradona37]

No both.. stats and performance.

Gone from 'poor' to 'good' though so you have been educated in part.

I watched him the entire season and his performances were much worse than his stats.

Even many Man United fans say this about Rashford - he's like post peak Ronaldo or Haaland in that he's often invisible in general play but pops up with a winning goal or something.

Also cannot play against low blocks as said, cheers kid.

 

[Maradona37]

Ah awards are pointless... yet you argue those that watch know he was poor when those that watch.. fans, players and PFA disagree.

My apologies not 'poor' now but 'good'.

The same fans and players who think he was better than haaland and de bruyne? or that Casemiro was better than Rodri?

Nae bother mate.

 

[JamDav1982]

I watched him the entire season and his performances were much worse than his stats.

Even many Man United fans say this about Rashford - he's like post peak Ronaldo or Haaland in that he's often invisible in general play but pops up with a winning goal or something.

Also cannot play against low blocks as said, cheers kid.

Back to 'I watched him the most'.

Top stuff.

 

[JamDav1982]

The same fans and players who think he was better than haaland and de bruyne? or that Casemiro was better than Rodri?

Nae bother mate.

You yourself said that players are irrelevant by time vote gets that far and they vote by club.

Nae bother mate.

As said was ten steps ahead of you on how you would attempt to argue what point on that award was.

Cheers kid.

 

[Maradona37]

Back to 'I watched him the most'.

Top stuff.

Not about watching him the most.

It's about having to watch him to see from the eye test that he was generally on the periphery of games, even where he registered goals or assists. Not every game, but plenty.

If you watched him and didn't see that you must be clueless. Which is a distinct possibility, to be fair.

 

[Maradona37]

You yourself said that players are irrelevant by time vote gets that far and they vote by club.

Nae bother mate.

As said was ten steps ahead of you on how you would attempt to argue what point on that award was.

Cheers kid.

The only reason you are 'ten steps ahead' is because your drivel is so inane and your sheer reliance on dubious appeals to authority so strong that I really don't have to counter with anything other than what I have.

There really is nothing else to say. You are arguing in defence of an award and people who think rashy deserves poty over haaland and de bruyne, or rodri was lesser than casemiro that season.

Go post your shite on Bluemoon and you'll get laughed off the site.

 

[JamDav1982]

Not about watching him the most.

It's about having to watch him to see from the eye test that he was generally on the periphery of games, even where he registered goals or assists. Not every game, but plenty.

If you watched him and didn't see that you must be clueless. Which is a distinct possibility, to be fair.

'If you watched him'.

Fans, players and PFA watched him min.

'I watched the most football'..

Yuk.

 

[JamDav1982]

The only reason you are 'ten steps ahead' is because your drivel is so inane and your sheer reliance on dubious appeals to authority so strong that I really don't have to counter with anything other than what I have.

There really is nothing else to say. You are arguing in defence of an award and people who think rashy deserves poty over haaland and de bruyne, or rodri was lesser than casemiro that season.

Go post your shite on Bluemoon and you'll get laughed off the site.

Jeepers new low... 'go post on Blue moon'.

So the rules are this... you and 'bluemoon' cant be wrong.

'Appeals to authority'.

You dont even know what it means and contradicting yourself once again.

Go do your chores.

 

[Maradona37]

'If you watched him'.

Fans, players and PFA watched him min.

'I watched the most football'..

Yuk.

Fans who are biased towards him? And also susceptible to his hype in the media? As are ex-pros. And think he was better than haaland and kev? and that Casemiro was better than Rodri?

Do you think anyone is ever gonna advocate the season of a non-hyped player like Wilson or Toney over 'England's great hope' Rashford?

You're not very good at this, are you?

 

[JamDav1982]

Fans who are biased towards him? And also susceptible to his hype in the media? As are ex-pros. And think he was better than haaland and kev? and that Casemiro was better than Rodri?

Do you think anyone is ever gonna advocate the season of a non-hyped player like Wilson or Toney over 'England's great hope' Rashford?

You're not very good at this, are you?

Aye fans are 'biased' over other at the club that season.. like the players were 'biased'... like the PFA were... 'biased'.

Top stuff.

Wilson and Toney are irrelevant.

Awful points.

You are awful at this but bet you are some boy on 'Bluemoon'

Up there with 'my dads harder the your dad' stuff.

 

[Gnidrologist]

Hey wat going on here guise?

 

[Maradona37]

Jeepers new low... 'go post on Blue moon'.

So the rules are this... you and 'bluemoon' cant be wrong.

'Appeals to authority'.

You dont even know what it means and contradicting yourself once again.

Go do your chores.

I knew what an appeal to authority was when you were in nappies, child.

Fact is, if fans opinions matter, why not Bluemoon? Why is it ok for you to argue in favour of tribal Man United fans voting for Marcus, but I can't do the opposite with man city fans advocating for haaland or kev?

Fact is you have zero response. You know if you claim rashford deserved fans poty over haaland or kev in 22-23, or casemiro deserved team of the year more than rodri, you'd be making a cunt of yourself.

Keep clinging to 'fans POTY' from donkeys years ago. Maybe it will help him win the PL this season.

 

[Maradona37]

Aye fans are 'biased' over other at the club that season.. like the players were 'biased'... like the PFA were... 'biased'.

Top stuff.

Exactly, Which is why it's stupid for you to argue about 'fans poty' as it's an exercise in tribalism.

 

[Maradona37]

Anyway, keep extolling the virtues of awards that say rashford was better than haaland and de bruyne in 22-23. I am sure they're not wrong at all.