Search results

Just making the point that they'd laugh at you if you went on there and told them rashy is a 100m player on his day, and that he deserved 22-23 poty over haaland and kev. Or that casemiro was better than rodri that season. You might as well be a United fan given your hopeful delusion.

So if you and United fans, and the odd opposition fan thinks Rashford is a '100m on his day (that day being 29 february) and loads of other people (like me and oppo fans( think he's one of the most overrated, average players in the world. Why are you right?

Misquoting as usual. Never said they would 'sort you out' you liar. I am making the point that you keep clinging to United fans rating Rashy. But loads of opposition fans think he's wank. Is their opinion worth less? Both sides are biased in different directions. I am highlighting the futility...

'Sort you out' lol What I am saying is you keep arguing that United fans voting for a United player counts for a lot - so the lads on city, liverpool and arsenal forums can be biased too by your logic. And most of them don't rate Rashy. Is their not rating of him worth less than the great...

The Fans POTY isn't an award where whoever has the most fans votes for their own player. It isn't at all like when Liverpool or United fans (as having many more online fans than most) take over online votes and vote for the Liverpool or United player in question. No siree.

Low level stuff by thinking City have better players and team than United. meanwhile Jammy and Redcafe are operating on the top level with beliefs like Rashford based on 1 season out of 8 can be a 100m player, casemiro was better than rodri in 22-23, rashford deserved the Fans POTY (Lol) over...

They're definitely more knowledegable and less deluded than you. Makes sense given their team is brilliant and Rashford's United are a laughing stock. They don't have any reason to be insecure as they win most stuff. Long term old-school football fans like me, and unlike you.

You probably stole that from someone else years ago too. You plagiarise people's phrases like Rashford tries to plagiarise Ronaldo's style of play and PR team.

Ultimately, it shows the stupidity of the voters, doesn't it? Whether theyr'e players, United fans, fans of whoever. You simply cannot argue for the credibility of an award that says Rashford was superior to Haaland and de Bruyne in 22-23, or that Casemiro was better than Rodri yet here you...

'Fake news' Come up with your own material.

United fans think rashford was better thn two man city players in 22-23 and that casemiro was better than rodri - colour me surprised.

Ultimately this all started because you made a completely laughable post about Rashford being a good gamble for Barca over Raphinha. Not only was it completely out of nowhere, as Rashford will never even join Barca (more chance of the atomic bomb going off), but if he did, he would cripple...

Anyway, keep extolling the virtues of awards that say rashford was better than haaland and de bruyne in 22-23. I am sure they're not wrong at all.

Exactly, Which is why it's stupid for you to argue about 'fans poty' as it's an exercise in tribalism.

I knew what an appeal to authority was when you were in nappies, child. Fact is, if fans opinions matter, why not Bluemoon? Why is it ok for you to argue in favour of tribal Man United fans voting for Marcus, but I can't do the opposite with man city fans advocating for haaland or kev? Fact is...

Fans who are biased towards him? And also susceptible to his hype in the media? As are ex-pros. And think he was better than haaland and kev? and that Casemiro was better than Rodri? Do you think anyone is ever gonna advocate the season of a non-hyped player like Wilson or Toney over 'England's...

The only reason you are 'ten steps ahead' is because your drivel is so inane and your sheer reliance on dubious appeals to authority so strong that I really don't have to counter with anything other than what I have. There really is nothing else to say. You are arguing in defence of an award...

Not about watching him the most. It's about having to watch him to see from the eye test that he was generally on the periphery of games, even where he registered goals or assists. Not every game, but plenty. If you watched him and didn't see that you must be clueless. Which is a distinct...

The same fans and players who think he was better than haaland and de bruyne? or that Casemiro was better than Rodri? Nae bother mate.

I watched him the entire season and his performances were much worse than his stats. Even many Man United fans say this about Rashford - he's like post peak Ronaldo or Haaland in that he's often invisible in general play but pops up with a winning goal or something. Also cannot play against...