Search results

The attacking prowess of Barca and Atleti are like night and day, even if you downgrade our attack to Paco, Neymar, Arda.

It's Alaves. He'll most likely have Neymar and Arda next to him and both are red hot right now. He'll have plenty of support, it's up to him to perform.

Iniesta was a Real Madrid fan during his Albacete and early La Masia days. It means just about as little as Isco naming his dog Messi prior to becoming a Madrid player.

I honestly doubt he stays after this season, and if he does he's almost 100% gone. Tarin is a year younger than Marlon and only really has one season of B team experience, so he'll most likely have to impress Lucho's successor, whoever that may be. By then the likes of Mascherano and Mathieu...

As far as I'm concerned, from the moment he signed for Barca B it was with the full intention of him playing as a midfielder. Him moving to midfield in Germany is a good thing, imo. Granted, I still don't fancy his chances of making it here :lol:

Of course he kissed it lol, he wants minutes.

I don't count any one of the three. How is Alen a La Masia product when he's got one season with our B team under his belt lol. We could call Bravo a La Masia graduate too with that reasoning. Btw, do you know if flies sleep?

Lmao this is getting so out of hand

If you're promoted from Juvenil level to the B team your La Masia, in my eyes. Those who say Pedro and Puyol don't count are typically just whiners who want to complain about a lack of La Masia influence.

Well of course, Samper is going to be playing CM :pep:

Mujica has played well in the minutes he's been given, hopefully he can step up and help the team in Cardona's absence. Would be nice to have a La Masia product lead the B team again too.

He's getting onto Suarez but hot damn look at Mathieu there lmao

*deep breath* Meh.

How is Paco doing the best out of the 3? Just because he plays for Barca now, even before his first game?

If you look at comparisons of their stats you have to give excuses for why Paco's stats are comparatively worse. The "He has a bad team" defense is good enough to stop me from thinking he's shit, but I'm not sure where the notion that we have "4 good forwards" is coming from, either. If he...

That's my point. People act like him missing sitters and giving terrible passes back then was because he was in poor form but really, that's just what he does. He'll miss five sitters and still get a hat trick in the same game sometimes.

Did we seriously just concede in the opening minutes? Who screwed up?

If Paco can't do much better than Munir, who was considered "Not good", then how could he be considered good himself? As of now he hasn't shown us anything with Valencia to suggest he is, at least in my opinion. I really hope he does prove me wrong, hence why I referred to him as potential, but...

The entire team across the board was playing poorly. It's not like Suarez picked up form and stopped missing sitters all of a sudden. Even in his red hot form last season he still screwed up a tap in that made us lose to Real Madrid.

Because Paco has to be much, much better than even from what we've seen from Munir, who seemingly isn't anywhere near ready to be our backup. If Munir's form has been good I'd expect Paco to step on the field and at the very least play twice as well.