Windhook
Well-known member
Big 3 are Federer, Nadal and Nole. They defined tennis for the last 20 years.
I don't know about you, but others replied to me a couple of years ago that Alcaraz will not be dominant.
Tennis
- Thread starter Plip
- Start date
Windhook
Well-known member
No, we didn't. Want to go back to Javier Zanetti/Buffon arguments? When will you grow up?
Windhook
Well-known member
Gnidrologist
Senior Member
From what i heard this Vucic guy is also a globhomo agent, prolly one of the WEF "young leaders", no?
Windhook
Well-known member
Don't think so. Vucic originates from the conservative Slobodan Milosevic era, his rule is similar to Viktor Orban.
Djokovic sides with the protesting students in Serbia. In other words the "foreign agents".
Gnidrologist
Senior Member
Whatever his origins, as i understand he tows the line of golbohomo. Like supporting gay prides, muh Ukraine, Yidsrahell and so on. But that was just random posts i read, haven't researched for myself.
Rassvet
Well-known member
Thoughts on the US final @Temptation?
Pretty brutal beatdown from Alcanaldo. Maybe Sinner was slightly injured as he looked off it since the second set in the semis, but I don't think he can touch Alcaraz's best level even if he is at 100%.
Pretty brutal beatdown from Alcanaldo. Maybe Sinner was slightly injured as he looked off it since the second set in the semis, but I don't think he can touch Alcaraz's best level even if he is at 100%.
Temptation
Well-known member
Alcaraz has a lower floor but a higher ceiling than Sinner. Sinner's worst is better and is more consistent. They have a very interesting dynamic. Sinner's floor is higher than most people's ceiling and he's just so incredibly consistent. Alcaraz on the other hand can have some off days but at his best he's simply unbeatable.
Since I know way more about Tennis than anybody else here, I'll say Sinner plays his opponents while Alcaraz plays himself.
Sinner hits a level most players simply can’t live with except for Alcaraz and Djokovic before this. Alcaraz, on the other hand, creates problems no one can solve but occasionally, not even he can control them.
KingLeo10
Senior Member
Just the Laver Cup, but Agassi showing why he’s a tennis genius in leading Team World to victory over Team Europe
Agassi and Sampras have gotten underrated in last 20 years.
No better ball striker than Agassi and no better serve and volley than Sampras (although Johnny Mac has the best volley ever).
Agassi and Sampras have gotten underrated in last 20 years.
No better ball striker than Agassi and no better serve and volley than Sampras (although Johnny Mac has the best volley ever).
Last edited:
Richard.H
Senior Member
A far cry from the current American tennis landscape. Insane to think even Roddick was far more talented than all the current Americans. Personally think Roddick is very underrated and could've had more majors if he didn't get run over by the Fed train.
delancey
Senior Member
That is an interesting take about Roddick. I always felt that he was way overrated because the American tennis community desperately wanted a successor to Sampras et al. Hence the wild expectations placed upon him at a time when the tennis world was witnessing the birth of a golden generation.
Roddick was on par with Todd Martin perhaps. No where near the big guns.
Roddick was on par with Todd Martin perhaps. No where near the big guns.
KingLeo10
Senior Member
He wasn't a special player but Todd Martin isn't pushing Federer to the extent Roddick did at the 2009 Wimbledon final (one of the best matches ever played).
Temptation
Well-known member
Roddick was a bit of a servebot and slightly overrated due to his entertaining personality.
Home of Barca Fans
