Like Lucho but qsg winning UCL is such a terrible moment (it's likely to happen though).Got to say I am rooting for Lucho now to win the competition. He deserves it.
Problem is the billionaire owner buying the CL already happened with Chelsea in 2012 and Man City in 2023 so unfortunately that horse has bolted.Like Lucho but qsg winning UCL is such a terrible moment (it's likely to happen though).
Chelsea at least was a club. While City and PSG are marketing tools to whitewash their oil countries and boost tourism. They don't care about football, they use it as a tool and laugh about the west how easy it is to buy them in modern times (especially with their own, western money).Problem is the billionaire owner buying the CL already happened with Chelsea in 2012 and Man City in 2023 so unfortunately that horse has bolted.
Surprising fact for you mate. Man City had won the league (2) and FA Cup(4) pre buyout more than Chelsea before being bought out, league (1) and FA Cup (3) (pre 2003).Chelsea at least was a club. While City and PSG are marketing tools to whitewash their oil countries and boost tourism. They don't care about football, they use it as a tool and laugh about the west how easy it is to buy them in modern times (especially with their own, western money).
As an Englishman the last thing I need is an Arsenal win. They are insufferable enough as it isHe's a good man but no way I'm supporting QSG. I find it incredible that many Barca fans are supporting them considering their fans are some of the vilest fans in Europe who have anti Barca chants because they are still butthurt about 2017. Hoping for an Arsenal vs Inter final. Don't care who wins that final.
He's a good man but no way I'm supporting QSG. I find it incredible that many Barca fans are supporting them considering their fans are some of the vilest fans in Europe who have anti Barca chants because they are still butthurt about 2017. Hoping for an Arsenal vs Inter final. Don't care who wins that final.
I know their history. I should have put it differently. Chelsea is "just" a billionaire's toy, while City and PSG are political white washing tools.Surprising fact for you mate. Man City had won the league (2) and FA Cup(4) pre buyout more than Chelsea before being bought out, league (1) and FA Cup (3) (pre 2003).
Problem is City absolutely sank down a couple of divisions in the late 90's and 00's before getting promoted again whereas Chelsea used to be a 6th-8th place side for a number of years so the trajectory wasn't quite as extreme.
Fair enough mate.I know their history. I should have put it differently. Chelsea is "just" a billionaire's toy, while City and PSG are political white washing tools.
I know their history. I should have put it differently. Chelsea is "just" a billionaire's toy, while City and PSG are political white washing tools.