delancey
Senior Member
Sure 😂😉I am him.
ACKNOWLEDGE ME.
Daniel Alves
- Thread starter Evil
- Start date
Gnidrologist
Senior Member
That's why i'm certain she's lying. She wasn't disgusted by his cock at all before venturing into bathroom to hold his peepee for no reason at all. After the fact she changed her story into uh oh muh rape. Maybe he really went some harsh sadistic pumping on her, which she wasn't expecting, but they both went there for obviously mutual reason and it definitely wasn't to snort coke, which do all the time in the open in their comfy compounds. And even if that was the case, why would she snort coke with some stranger, while being drunk in a fucking bathroom lol?
Why don't you guys actually read up on the case to have your questions answered? Nobody here is going to give you an answer. If you want to believe Alves is innocent then so be it, nobody cares. He got convicted and that's it. If you have doubts look it up instead of making up assumptions on here with mental gymnastics.
Where are all the articles that the court made a mistake? Why isn't anyone defending a legend like Alves publicly?
Where are all the articles that the court made a mistake? Why isn't anyone defending a legend like Alves publicly?
Gnidrologist
Senior Member
Did anyone say anything contrary to what was known by the court?
El Gato
Villarato!
Nah lol ofc not
Pure nonsense folk here made up without knowing she went to hospital that night along with policemen, would have been tested for it provided nature of the callout by the bar and would have played part in final verdict if were to do any
Windhook
Well-known member
Oh, praise the Lord! So she's the CIA plant to diminish FC Barcelona as institute.
Don't troll me.
Last edited:
El Gato
Villarato!
Aye anything, they're not even trolling, just acting like lazy bottom feeder clods
Dudes sounding off on it have read like two 4 paragraph summaries by Marca or nothing at all, come asking about or doubting evidence they havent read and now proceed to arguing about corrupt courts etc where in reality very difficult to get convicted in this day and age when you are a person like Alves unless evidence very clearly against you
Dudes sounding off on it have read like two 4 paragraph summaries by Marca or nothing at all, come asking about or doubting evidence they havent read and now proceed to arguing about corrupt courts etc where in reality very difficult to get convicted in this day and age when you are a person like Alves unless evidence very clearly against you
delancey
Senior Member
@El Gato
Hey 🐱! I believe that it was your homeboy Gomer Pyle who introduced the idea of drugs having been involved that evening.
Regardless, he introduced this hypothesis, I reckon, as a way of explaining why a woman would willingly join a man in a restroom moments after he had placed her hand on his crotch while dancing together (resulting in her having had feelings of disgust for him).
Court records also indicate that she followed him to the bathroom not knowing what was on the other side of the door. I don’t know about you, but most people wouldn’t willingly follow a “disgusting” man through a door without knowing what was on the other side. Again, hence why some may doubt witness testimony.
It's public record; look it up.
That is what was being discussed! Perhaps you should try adding to the conversation instead of regurgitating nonsense? 🐱
With that said, I have never claimed that he is innocent, but rather that some behaviour by the accuser was peculiar.
Finally, in your country, a famous footballer had his reputation and career as a top footballer taken away from him after an English prosecutor foolishly decided to file charges against him (despite underwhelming evidence). He spent 134 days in jail, forced out of the club of his dreams, and had his reputation tarnished forever. Luckily a jury of 6 men and 6 women eventually found him not guilty after the “honourable” prosecutor was done with monkey business of spewing micro corruption. I reckon Mendy being black and foreign made him an easier target too, perhaps? All of this during MeToo's heyday. No correlation, whatsoever, k? K!
Therefore, we can conclude that one mustn't be convicted of a crime for an English prosecutor to irreversibly damage a man's reputation (despite you insinuating otherwise). Again, mere charges will suffice. Oops, micro corruption within the CPS? Or just mere incompetence? Which is it?
Oh, and how difficult it is to convict depends on the country. Perhaps Mendy wouldn’t have been so lucky in another country with more corruption (and/or lower threshold for a conviction) than in England?
FYI, Spain ranks 36th on the Corruptions Index, just slightly above Brunei and Botswana. Recently Its democracy was also classified as flawed. Make of that whatever you will.
Hey 🐱! I believe that it was your homeboy Gomer Pyle who introduced the idea of drugs having been involved that evening.
Regardless, he introduced this hypothesis, I reckon, as a way of explaining why a woman would willingly join a man in a restroom moments after he had placed her hand on his crotch while dancing together (resulting in her having had feelings of disgust for him).
Court records also indicate that she followed him to the bathroom not knowing what was on the other side of the door. I don’t know about you, but most people wouldn’t willingly follow a “disgusting” man through a door without knowing what was on the other side. Again, hence why some may doubt witness testimony.
It's public record; look it up.
That is what was being discussed! Perhaps you should try adding to the conversation instead of regurgitating nonsense? 🐱
With that said, I have never claimed that he is innocent, but rather that some behaviour by the accuser was peculiar.
Finally, in your country, a famous footballer had his reputation and career as a top footballer taken away from him after an English prosecutor foolishly decided to file charges against him (despite underwhelming evidence). He spent 134 days in jail, forced out of the club of his dreams, and had his reputation tarnished forever. Luckily a jury of 6 men and 6 women eventually found him not guilty after the “honourable” prosecutor was done with monkey business of spewing micro corruption. I reckon Mendy being black and foreign made him an easier target too, perhaps? All of this during MeToo's heyday. No correlation, whatsoever, k? K!
Therefore, we can conclude that one mustn't be convicted of a crime for an English prosecutor to irreversibly damage a man's reputation (despite you insinuating otherwise). Again, mere charges will suffice. Oops, micro corruption within the CPS? Or just mere incompetence? Which is it?
Oh, and how difficult it is to convict depends on the country. Perhaps Mendy wouldn’t have been so lucky in another country with more corruption (and/or lower threshold for a conviction) than in England?
FYI, Spain ranks 36th on the Corruptions Index, just slightly above Brunei and Botswana. Recently Its democracy was also classified as flawed. Make of that whatever you will.
Last edited:
Temptation
Well-known member
[Sport] Barça has stripped Dani Alves of the status of the club's legendary footballer, a status shared by up to 102 footballers who have defended the Zamarra Blaugrana since its creation on November 29, 1899.
@Andresito @delancey maybe the club knows some details we don't. If he was innocent, he wouldn't be wrongly convicted. He's too powerful for that shit.
@Andresito @delancey maybe the club knows some details we don't. If he was innocent, he wouldn't be wrongly convicted. He's too powerful for that shit.
Windhook
Well-known member
130 players are listed on the official site and Dani Alves is still there. The club is awaiting the outcome of Dani's verdict appeal.
Barca's reaction is standard practice of the current age we're living.
Barca's reaction is standard practice of the current age we're living.
Last edited:
delancey
Senior Member
Nazario1985
Senior Member
So the list of Barcelona convicts is : Diego(probation)/Guardiola/Ronaldinho/Alves
am I missing someone ?
am I missing someone ?
Home of Barca Fans
