It's 4 games.He's worth about 60-70M at best, so in the end he'll be a flopp...
It's 4 games.
You probably think Isak is gonna be a flop too, don't you?
Are you stuck in 2016?Isak is probably closer to an €70-€80m player as well
Wirtz is worth about as much as Cherki
Are you stuck in 2016?
Players like Nicolas Jackson cost 80 mil in the current market.
Enzo was 120 mil and Caicedo was like 110.
Isak is one of the best players in the whole league.
PL tax is a thing in the transfer market. PL teams would have to pay more for Isak.PSG bought Vitinha, Barcola, Mendes, João Neves, Doué, Hakimi, etc. — for less than €60m each, with a few of them costing under €40m.
Some of you only follow Madrid or FCB along with the EPL, so you don't understand that there isn't a direct correlation between expenditure and quality
PL tax is a thing in the transfer market. PL teams would have to pay more for Isak.
Vitinha was a flop at Wolves and his stock was low. Also attackers cost more than mids.
Ofcourse. Check the CL and Liverpool are the luckiest club threads.Did Caf lose their minds?
LOLLiverpool are the luckiest club thread.
That's called good scouting as @Jair Ventura says. Identifying talented players who might have failed for different reasons than their ability - they talk about it in Soccernomics. A niche or glitch in the market. Then giving them the platform to fulfil their potential - potential not yet realised, hence them being much cheaper.Vitinha was a flop at Wolves and his stock was low.
Fucking hell, you know times are tough when Harvey Elliott is one of your star youth players (and you signed him when he was 16, by the way).