Maradona37
Well-known member
Fair enough. Good, well considered post.Liverpool are looking at the team who had a marvelous first half of the season, then full off thanks to lack of depth, when they faced their only true elite in-form time of the season, they lost decisively in all key areas, but the result was kind. A penalty loss.
I think they realised the next step is depth in quality to stay at the top throughout the season.
Now is 150m for Wirtz a necessary signing? Well on one hand, if they have the cash to spend and to go all out on their targets, then I guess why not. They assessed he is the best option. Sure they could quite literally get Cherki at a third of that fee, amortization and all, who is not a third of the player. But he isn't playing the off the ball system that Wirtz will, and offensively he is less robotic which may not suit Slot as much.
If after all this investment they don't retain the EPL and go further in the CL it is a failure, for sure. Atleast in the short term. I think even @Temptation would admit that.
I have to think more about this and maybe reconsider - admittedly my sample size of watching him is relatively small, and I am still thinking of guys like Havertz and Sancho, who to be fair didn't look as talented as Wirtz and aren't even really similar players really.
I might change my mind about him before the season starts. I think the reasonable view is not to say he will flop or be the second coming of De Bruyne, but to give him some time to acclimatise to their team and the league. It doesn't do anyone any favours - least of all Liverpool - if people rave over a strong start, or insult over a poor one. He needs to be judged long term i.e. over the length of time he is there. Too often we see players judged in moments or individual seasons (Rashford is a prime culprit for this) when what you want is the kind of consistency Salah has showed.
Make no mistake, Wirtz needs to make a Salah type impact (not necessarily in G/A as he's a link player and playmaker predominantly) and be the key player in that team alongside Salah. If he doesn't you know the knives will be out, questioning his fee.
I feel they've overspent and made a rod for their own back. Football fans are obsessed with how much players cost, but I suppose Edwards and Slot will argue if they have the money and he does well, what difference does it make if they spend 150 m or 90m? If it isn't impacting them financially as a club and their ability to buy other players too.
But like you say - in fans' eyes, with the kind of investment they are making, even if they do well collectively and Wirtz on an individual basis, anything other than retaining the PL and CL semis (minimum) will be looked at as a failure.
The good news for Liverpool is he's gonna be there for a while I would expect so there's always the season after, and the season after.