Temptation
Well-known member
Isak EkitikeFolk can agree or disagree on the merits of Lewa/Ferran... but is there a club in the world that has a better two options at CF?
Cant think of any.
Isak EkitikeFolk can agree or disagree on the merits of Lewa/Ferran... but is there a club in the world that has a better two options at CF?
Cant think of any.
Letting Frenkie and Pedri dictate tempo has been easier to watch than going ballistic in attack like we did in quite a few games last year.
Matches this season are better managed and less chaotic.
Newcastle being the main example of that. Game was controlled beautifully due to Frenkie and Pedri.
Newcastle, the game where we scored on a cross and a long shot, two high risk/high reward actions? And then also conceded a goal while "controlling" the game.
Our friend there mentioned the Newcastle game as an endorsement of a this season's more "controlling" style of football, compared to last season's "ballistic" style of attacking.What do you expect?
Barca to never concede?
There are more chances to get balls into box and long range efforts the more get it into final third.
Barca have not been shying away from 'high risk/high reward' moments either.
FDJ and Pedri constantly pass ball forward and taking it in areas where it is a risk.
I saw barca playing a bad first half but the 2nd was perfect control. Just one attack for newcastle and goal. After this goal we managed to get full control and play it home. Midfield improved much this season but i also think this costs as a few goals, the question is can we still play the „ballistik offense game“ if we have to?Our friend there mentioned the Newcastle game as an endorsement of a this season's more "controlling" style of football, compared to last season's "ballistic" style of attacking.
I'm saying that it was exactly our "ballistic" strain of attacking that scored us two goals in that game, while our "controlling style" -- typified in combinations around the box -- scored us zero goals. And that it didn't prevent us from conceding either.
Is this meant to be sarcastic?We had so much control we required a rashford worldie to win the game.
False.We had so much control we required a rashford worldie to win the game.
The game is midfield was good, but not some standard we should use that game to set.
Howe played right into our hands, other managers and certainly Enrique with a fully fit team won't do that, even with him missing the front 3 he likely won't.
Attacking wise, surely no-one would deny that the point of slower, safer build-ups is to open a sustained window of opportunity for combinations around the box. That is the only attacking style that benefits particularly from that style of moderation.
If we wanted to play for long shots or crosses, there are easier and more conducive ways to score goals through those weapons.
Defensively, the point of slower, safer build-ups is to defend through possession. A valid strategy with its own pros and cons. I would prefer trying to score more goals instead. That's all I'm saying.
This was the lineup then: Ter Stegen, Koundé, Araujo, Cubarsí, Cancelo; Pedri. Gundogan. De Jong; Lamimne Yamal, Lewandowski and Raphinha.
Stronger than what we can field now.
The fact that the lineup looks so good today is testament to how much Flick got the best out of them.
Back then that lineup wasn't good enough to compete with a pre Bellend, pre Baguette Madrid.
Obviously Pedri and Lameen have grown a ton since then. Cubarsi, not so much, his ball playing back then was more uncapped and better.