Champions League 25/26

Winner?


  • Total voters
    42

Maradona37

Well-known member
Rashford would though. Gnabry still gets lots of game time and Rashford is on that level. He would easily be a rotation player. He would also score more goals over the season than the extremely wasteful Luis Diaz if he started on the left.

I get that Pavlovic is young, but that's my point. He's a youngster still learning the game and only just starting to make a name for himself for his club and country. Rice has been quality for years now and is one of the first names on the team sheet for Arsenal and England. He's comfortably clear of Pavlovic as of right now. In 3 or 4 years time, who knows?
Luis Diaz is a better player than Marcus Rashford, in my opinion. Though neither are that amazing.

Yes and I agreed Rice is better now. My issue was your laughing smilies, as if Pavlovic sucks. The sheer English arrogant dismisal, reminds me of the famous kevin Keegan quote before the 4-1 hammering of England by Germany in South Africa.

'In 3 or 4 years time, who knows?'

Yes, that is my contention.
 

Jair Ventura

Well-known member
I watched the game (and he was dog shit) while you were sat in your Mum's basement jerking off over your posters of Luis Enrique.

Get off the crack and seek help for yourself asap, nerd.

If you'd watched the game you wouldn't have lied about why he was subbed. You didn't even know he played.

You're only resorting to lame personal attacks because you've been called on your bullshit.
 

Tyler

Active member
Luis Diaz is a better player than Marcus Rashford, in my opinion. Though neither are that amazing.

Yes and I agreed Rice is better now. My issue was your laughing smilies, as if Pavlovic sucks. The sheer English arrogant dismisal, reminds me of the famous kevin Keegan quote before the 4-1 hammering of England by Germany in South Africa.

'In 3 or 4 years time, who knows?'

Yes, that is my contention.

Better player? Probably. Rashford without any shadow of a doubt would score more goals though.
 

JamDav1982

Senior Member
Subbing players for being poor doesn’t happen in the 87th minute. What’s more likely is you’ve been talking out of your ass, don’t follow football outside of the EPL, and therefore are clueless to Pavolic’s progression.

Or I can compare them now because he’s better now. Hence his rapid development into a key player for a superior football club, and a superior footballing country.

'Superior football country'.

When literally Bayerns best 2 players were made in England and the best German player moved to EPL and so far is struggling.

Poor point.
 
Last edited:

Maradona37

Well-known member
Better player? Probably. Rashford without any shadow of a doubt would score more goals though.
That's your problem - I don't rate who the best player is by goalscoring. Otherwise I'd find a clown like Lewandowski to be better than Maradona, or would think Lukaku had a better int. career than Gerd Muller.
 

Tyler

Active member
If you'd watched the game you wouldn't have lied about why he was subbed. You didn't even know he played.

You're only resorting to lame personal attacks because you've been called on your bullshit.

From memory they subbed off one player on 60 something minutes who had picked up a knock. Germany left the rest on the pitch for so long probably as punishment for being so wank against such a poor side.

No point me arguing any more with stupid anyway.
 

Jair Ventura

Well-known member
From memory they subbed off one player on 60 something minutes who had picked up a knock. Germany left the rest on the pitch for so long probably as punishment for being so wank against such a poor side.

No point me arguing any more with stupid anyway. I

You’re full of shit, and everyone see’s it. That’s why you’re upset.
 

Tyler

Active member
How is Rice v Pavlovic this season to be gauaged?

Who has the better CL?

Who has better CL+World Cup?

Whats the rules?

Common sense 😉

One is a player that cost 100 million and has been worth every penny. The other is a promising young player that's only just started playing regularly for his club and country instead of being a bit part player.
 

Maradona37

Well-known member
Common sense 😉

One is a player that cost 100 million and has been worth every penny. The other is a promising young player that's only just started playing regularly for his club and country instead of being a bit part player.
Nobody denies that. But Pavlovic might be better in a few years.

You laughed at Pavlovic for something that might only be a transient thing.
 

Tyler

Active member
Nobody denies that. But Pavlovic might be better in a few years.

You laughed at Pavlovic for something that might only be a transient thing.

I laughed because he's not better as of now in any shape or form. And to suggest so is ludicrous.

But I literally implied early on that Pavlovic is at the start of his career and nobody knows what his ceiling might be. I don't think he's 'that' good personally, but have no problem with anyone who thinks he might become a special player.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top