City paid 75m for Marmoush in January. Don’t think he’s available.Why is Lookman overlooked?
Also Marmoush?? He is wasted at City. Seems more of a squad player there.
Yeah Lookman isn't a world beater or main guy or anything, but you feel he could be a very capable squad player for a top team. He's shown his ability a lot at Atalanta. He doesn't seem a very hyped player in general though. Seems to fly under the radar. Plus I think he will be 29 next season. I believe he's born in 1997 but not entire sure.City paid 75m for Marmoush in January. Don’t think he’s available.
Haven’t seen many rumors regarding Lookman in general. It’s odd.
Indeed, think so too. His wages aren’t crazy, fee shouldn’t be too high, versatile, and seems flexible enough to be in rotation.Yeah Lookman isn't a world beater or main guy or anything, but you feel he could be a very capable squad player for a top team. He's shown his ability a lot at Atalanta. He doesn't seem a very hyped player in general though. Seems to fly under the radar. Plus I think he will be 29 next season. I believe he's born in 1997 but not entire sure.
Indeed, think so too. His wages aren’t crazy, fee shouldn’t be too high, versatile, and seems flexible enough to be in rotation.
Just checked. Born in October 1997, so 28 this October. Younger than Diaz too.
Yah, with finances being a major consideration for Barca (and most clubs) he could be a relatively cheaper, low-key player to bring in and alleviate pressure from Raphinha. Would he be happy being a rotation player? I expect so, for a fair and reasonable fee and salary.Indeed, think so too. His wages aren’t crazy, fee shouldn’t be too high, versatile, and seems flexible enough to be in rotation.
Just checked. Born in October 1997, so 28 this October. Younger than Diaz too.
Yes. I don't see how even at 40-50mil+ he would be a better option. He's 29 and medicore and will not be a starter. We have starters. A younger, prospect who is likely to perform similarly, for less money, while also not having to be replaced in 2-3 years makes so much more sense.It will be extremely myopic to think Fofana is a project. Besides, you already have a starter in Raph and Yamal, why would you want to spend 60m on another 29 year old "starter" for a bench role?
Barcola and Doue also looked like projects before PSG snapped them up now they are considered top players. Yamal was a project last season too.
Ironically, Liverpool is already lining uomp the same Fofana for 25m if Barca stupdly pay 60m for a 29 year old Diaz in the search for a "staryer material". In 2 years Barca will be bidding 100m for Fofana from Liverpool.
Fofana has pace, 25m, two legged and in the ascendancy vs Diaz with average pace , one superior leg, 29 years and in the decline.
Knowing Barca management and their antecedents, it is obvious the one they will go for
If lookman goes to another club for a reported fee less than 45m, while we are looking to spend upwards of 50m for Diaz, Leao, and Nico.
I will lose my shit.
He is the ideal player for us. Could be starter. Technically sound. Hard worker, with no fuss. Low in wages. Would be happy to be a rotational player. Mature. Can be a ST.