19 - Lamine Yamal

Titan98

Active member
Mbappe for exaple gets 31 + 150/5= 61 per year gross without bonuses. Lamine is the better player and earns less then the half of his salary.

This is a good contract


Saudi would pay lamine 200 million a season with gross = net
 

malvolio

Senior Member
Mbappe for exaple gets 31 + 150/5= 61 per year gross without bonuses. Lamine is the better player and earns less then the half of his salary.

This is a good contract


Saudi would pay lamine 200 million a season with gross = net
Yamal is not better than Mbappe yet.

Saudi would pay insane amounts anyway, that's not the standard for European clubs.
 

El Flaco

Well-known member
Yamal is not better than Mbappe yet.

Saudi would pay insane amounts anyway, that's not the standard for European clubs.
At this point, Mbappe is the better goalscorer. Yamal is the better passer & dribbler. They are different type of players.

If Yamal becomes all-time great goalscorer, then he blows Mbappe out of the water as the far superior player.

The Saudi clubs doesnt have FFP rules that limits their spending spree like it does for Newcastle for example.

Rodri won Euros

It also helped that Vini has terrible PR (almost entirely by his own doing) than Rodri.

Even if they are true, we're talking about a player who is probably no1 in the world at the minute. 8m net a year fixed is indeed suspiciously low for such a player and the contract is long.

This is Yamals first big contract. He will be 23 by the time his contract expires in 2031.

Premier League clubs or even FC Bayern can offer a way bigger bag without breaking their budget unlike us.



Exactly

Look at Sterling , he's 30 and 100℅ finished. And he was also playing regular at a very young age

Lamine is playing ridiculous minutes for his age. I think it will take some special medicine treatment for him to push after he hits 30 and even so he will be finito

You also have Ryan Giggs who played from his teenage years until he retired at 40. He was very good well into his 30s.

Everyone are different.


In before all of you start the usual 'he is best player in the world already' blah, blah, blah...

Yeah, but he is 17! SEVENTEEN
No such deals can ever be given to a 17 year old.
Ask yourself how much he will be getting by 23, by 26, by 29, and so on.

Messi wasn't getting that amount (relatively to the time) compared to market, and wage structure of the team, neither at 19, nor at 22, nor at 25.
Still, at some point, he got a 100m gross per season contract that bankrupted the club, together with other ridiculous contracts.

Yamal is a much, much better player than a teenage Messi ever was.

Its completely justified Yamal gets a massive contract. Hell, Yamal is arguably underpaid given how much renevue he brings for us.
 
Last edited:

FCBarca

Mike the Knife
And I don‘t think this contract will make it to 2031, surely a renewal is ahead should his ascendency continue - that too, for me, is normal in football

In the end, the numbers are just that numbers, and they are linked to the huge pot of money clubs, leagues, UEFA, FIFA and media companies et al dip into. It is natural that the product (the players) are compensated fairly (Not fair to you or me but based on the revenue they are tied to generating)

Plus, buyouts are just that - an opportunity for a player to exit should a more interesting opportunity arise, just like it might for any of us in our lines of work. But the advantage of La Masia is that the dream is not just to succeed in professional football but to do so at the club of your dreams - I believe that sentiment is strong in the kid, protect him & the project and surely it will deepen to where the buyout fee is irrelevant when the player has no desire to go anywhere else

Far too early to contemplate these matters today, when Leo was this age we were just dying to see more of him with Ronaldinho - no one could predict the 20 years that would follow anymore than we can now with Lamine, although it could very well end up with Yamal even becoming the club’s greatest player in history…no one knows, time
 

RedxMAK

Well-known member
That's another exaggeration. It's ridiculous to even mention Messi.

Mbappe was terrorising CL heavy weights while at Monaco, at 17. And those were better teams than current versions. Won a WC at 18.
Mbappe won the World Cup at 19 and had that great UCL season at 18
 

M3ls

Well-known member
Yamal is not better than Messi at 17.

It all comes down to the fact that Yamal started playing in the first team at 16-17.

I am sure that Leo at 17 in the first team would have been better than Yamal.

It was just not common practice 20 years ago for 17 year old players to play in the first team.

Let's evaluate them by skills.

In terms of skills and "natural" qualities I see Yamal's ceiling if everything goes well - the maximum is the level of prime Neymar. Maybe a little higher.

But he will never reach Leo's level. Even if he trains 24/7 he will not reach this level, since the difference is in "natural" qualities.
 

mc_lovin

Senior Member
Messi's level at 17 is (mostly) purely hypothetical. Not really worth discussing.

On performances for the first team it's easily Yamal > Messi at 16/17. And its not particularly close.
 

M3ls

Well-known member
Messi's level at 17 is (mostly) purely hypothetical. Not really worth discussing.

On performances for the first team it's easily Yamal > Messi at 16/17. And its not particularly close.
I evaluate them by their "natural" qualities. Leo - low center of gravity, incredible starting speed, excellent speed at a distance, close control of the ball, which we have not seen in anyone in history and unique body movements, which were a consequence of his "natural" qualities, and not a product of training, etc.

Yamal has none of this - he is different in terms of anthropometry and "natural" qualities.
 

Porque

Senior Member
I don't care how Lamine plays at 30. What I care about is securing our interests today, without going overboard.

No one knows the true details of this contract yet. For now I'm just happy it's secured along with the rest of our squad. Minus Frenkie. Let's see what happens there as we risk losing him for free.
 

vegitot

Senior Member
That's another exaggeration. It's ridiculous to even mention Messi.

Mbappe was terrorising CL heavy weights while at Monaco, at 17. And those were better teams than current versions. Won a WC at 18.
Lol Yamal is better than current Mbappe, 18 years old Mbappe who?

Yamal won domestic treble against Mbappe's team lol. Schooled Mbappe's team in the last Euro and won when he was barely 17.

There is no comparison.
 

vegitot

Senior Member
Yamal is not better than Messi at 17.

It all comes down to the fact that Yamal started playing in the first team at 16-17.

I am sure that Leo at 17 in the first team would have been better than Yamal.

It was just not common practice 20 years ago for 17 year old players to play in the first team.

Let's evaluate them by skills.

In terms of skills and "natural" qualities I see Yamal's ceiling if everything goes well - the maximum is the level of prime Neymar. Maybe a little higher.

But he will never reach Leo's level. Even if he trains 24/7 he will not reach this level, since the difference is in "natural" qualities.
Not even Messi at 18 (2005/06) could compare to Yamal now, except for dribbling skill.

Messi at 19 (2006/07), yes.
 

Porque

Senior Member
Let's ignore the talent. But it's fair to say that Lamine is a more mature player.

Young Messi was an absolute buzzsaw though, just extreme youthful dribbling, while learning how to manage his body and injuries through his style. Had Ronaldinho and Eto'o to take the pressure off of his attack and attract space.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top