Messigician
Senior Member
They didn’t give it to Vinicius last year you think they’ll give it to Dembele?
Rodri won Euros
They didn’t give it to Vinicius last year you think they’ll give it to Dembele?
Yamal is not better than Mbappe yet.Mbappe for exaple gets 31 + 150/5= 61 per year gross without bonuses. Lamine is the better player and earns less then the half of his salary.
This is a good contract
Saudi would pay lamine 200 million a season with gross = net
At this point, Mbappe is the better goalscorer. Yamal is the better passer & dribbler. They are different type of players.Yamal is not better than Mbappe yet.
Saudi would pay insane amounts anyway, that's not the standard for European clubs.
Rodri won Euros
Even if they are true, we're talking about a player who is probably no1 in the world at the minute. 8m net a year fixed is indeed suspiciously low for such a player and the contract is long.
Exactly
Look at Sterling , he's 30 and 100℅ finished. And he was also playing regular at a very young age
Lamine is playing ridiculous minutes for his age. I think it will take some special medicine treatment for him to push after he hits 30 and even so he will be finito
In before all of you start the usual 'he is best player in the world already' blah, blah, blah...
Yeah, but he is 17! SEVENTEEN
No such deals can ever be given to a 17 year old.
Ask yourself how much he will be getting by 23, by 26, by 29, and so on.
Messi wasn't getting that amount (relatively to the time) compared to market, and wage structure of the team, neither at 19, nor at 22, nor at 25.
Still, at some point, he got a 100m gross per season contract that bankrupted the club, together with other ridiculous contracts.
That's another exaggeration. It's ridiculous to even mention Messi.Yamal is a much, much player than a teenage Messi ever was.
Mbappe won the World Cup at 19 and had that great UCL season at 18That's another exaggeration. It's ridiculous to even mention Messi.
Mbappe was terrorising CL heavy weights while at Monaco, at 17. And those were better teams than current versions. Won a WC at 18.
Yeah, I fucked up the years. Won Ligue 1 title at 18, scored in CL semis at 18 and WC he won at 19.Mbappe won the World Cup at 19 and had that great UCL season at 18
I evaluate them by their "natural" qualities. Leo - low center of gravity, incredible starting speed, excellent speed at a distance, close control of the ball, which we have not seen in anyone in history and unique body movements, which were a consequence of his "natural" qualities, and not a product of training, etc.Messi's level at 17 is (mostly) purely hypothetical. Not really worth discussing.
On performances for the first team it's easily Yamal > Messi at 16/17. And its not particularly close.
Lol Yamal is better than current Mbappe, 18 years old Mbappe who?That's another exaggeration. It's ridiculous to even mention Messi.
Mbappe was terrorising CL heavy weights while at Monaco, at 17. And those were better teams than current versions. Won a WC at 18.
Not even Messi at 18 (2005/06) could compare to Yamal now, except for dribbling skill.Yamal is not better than Messi at 17.
It all comes down to the fact that Yamal started playing in the first team at 16-17.
I am sure that Leo at 17 in the first team would have been better than Yamal.
It was just not common practice 20 years ago for 17 year old players to play in the first team.
Let's evaluate them by skills.
In terms of skills and "natural" qualities I see Yamal's ceiling if everything goes well - the maximum is the level of prime Neymar. Maybe a little higher.
But he will never reach Leo's level. Even if he trains 24/7 he will not reach this level, since the difference is in "natural" qualities.