MadridistaCule
Active member
I dont trust the process, dont think he's Barca material. You need a striker,Lewa is very old in football terms,so you only have 3 strikers.
14 - Marcus Rashford
- Thread starter Luftstalag14
- Start date
MadridistaCule
Active member
He did score 17x in a bang average UTD twice in his career. That's a decent tally. His overall numbers look nothing special though. Could be a decent impact sub and that's it. Something like Larsson,Ezquerro or Bojan Krkić.
Thought he was older though.
Thought he was older though.
El Ilusionista
Well-known member
Bryan Zaragoza could have been a decent impact sub too. Much cheaper also. Spending 14M on a United reject is while we are in a tight situation with FFP and leaking defence is just silly very silly. Deco masterclass.
MadridistaCule
Active member
Not even him is good enough for club with 28 leagues and 5 champions league. Dude scored 1 goal on loan in 27 games as a winger. Before that he needed 5 games for one goal,in a not so small sample size.
draconifire
NTC with a Positive attitude
Dude, after all these months of cribbing, you came up with Bryan Fucking Zaragoza, a player who scored a big number which amounts to single-digit goals in two seasons of LaLiga. On Top of being a Midget.
If that's who your LW backup would have been, I am happy with Rashford. And have stated it before, don't think we could do much better than him, albeit would have been perfect if he only costed 10m.
El Ilusionista
Well-known member
Bryan Zaragoza atleast knows how to beat his man. He aint a simple speed merchant like Rashy or even Adama Traore.(
)Also much cheaper we might have even had budget left for a CB. But instead you chose to pay 14M for a United reject who cant even beat his man. “I dont think we could have done better than Rashford” If Rashford was a great player United would have kept him.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Rashford is levels above Zaragoza is the reality.
Nowhere near good enough.
Been as well just promoting Virgili if want a wee player that can show some nice dribbles and little else.
El Ilusionista
Well-known member
Both Trashford and Rashy aint good enough, but one would have costed 3/4M one costs 14M for a single season.
MadridistaCule
Active member
Still a bad player for such an illustrous club.Both Trashford and Rashy aint good enough, but one would have costed 3/4M one costs 14M for a single season.
El Ilusionista
Well-known member
We will have to see, until now Rashford in a Barca shirt hasnt even been better than post ACL Ansu Fati.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Both Trashford and Rashy aint good enough, but one would have costed 3/4M one costs 14M for a single season.
And one is clearly the better player and the club were looking for someone more versatile and with pace in behind which team lacks.
Rashford may not pan out by Zaragoza would never have been considered even for that much cheaper and rightfully so.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Rashford could fail.
But still Zaragoza was not at all what club looking for and doesnt make him a decent option.
If Rashford fails then argument would be better of without him not that it gives any credit to Zaragoza.
Fati never did his ACL but Rashford is better than him after knee injury and more uses.
El Ilusionista
Well-known member
If he was such a good player United would have kept him lol
JamDav1982
Senior Member
If Zaragoza was such a good player he would be at a better level and Barca would take him.
He is pish and not what Barca were attempting to get.
Rashford failing doesnt mean anything positive for a poor option like Zaragoza.
Home of Barca Fans
