Search results

Zidane is superior ahead of Xavi & Iniesta , ditto Makelele .. , Hierro would be a starter Raul at his best ? before he lost his pace ? well debatable but he was the gladiator of all European teams

Scholes and co were comparison to the 2009 team I didn't say he PLAYED the game I was comparing the old Utd team with this one and the old Utd team beats the 2009 by a country mile maybe you should stop dreaming about men's ass and read Rooney is not fit to tie Ruud shoes as a striker ...

Those 2 games is why i picked this particular game & why I doubt your current team would win with ease as you suggested this game came with the clear decline of the Galactico's (the 3-0 you mention the famous Carlos to Iker joke with Eto'o stealing and scoring ) and the following 3-0 which...

Zidane did win one CL..but the team was super since 99-2000 season which they won the CL as well..Zizou was the cherry on top of the cake As for Ronaldo go to his first two seasons with Real.. dare i saw most of the time when he was fit except the last season-2..he was still devastating Ask...

Ronaldo did quite well with Inter even won the UEFA cup when it was enjoyable ... you must have missed it Till of course Injury got the best of him Ronaldo at his best was unstoppable .. Messi style unstoppable and top that with the fact it was both National team and club level .. i guess the...

The idea was never comparing them to Messi but comparing them to Rooney, Torres (before his injury) Ibra (there, I said it) Falcao, Aguero, Silva, Drogba, Eto'o, Wesley, Ribery, Robben, Nani, Ozil, Di Maria ..etc Messi would be comparable to Zidane at his best , Ronaldo at his best..etc not...

clasico's has nothing to do with form .. look no further than this year and vs a younger Raul , Ronaldo ,Hierro , Makalele, Figo & Zidane ? good luck with that..

I don't think most of the current stars outside Barca & Real would even be anywhere except the bench of the 98s -2003 teams people Like Nani has nothing on the likes of Overmars , Nedved and other wingers in that era I'm talking the period were Zizou was in Juve as well , I don't think either...

Greece win is a mix of luck and of course rise of the level of football in Greece , it still remain a fluke but u can't achieve it with 11 idiots as for Valencia .. look mate this a team that won la liga , UEFA cup and played the final of the CL twice.. losing to us in one of them... what do...

I think you would wipe the floor with the 98..draw with the 2000 but will find it really hard with the 2002 and you could easily lose .. take into consideration it's Del Bosque not Jose

Nightmare because that Chelsea was something to watch with Zola , Valencia was extremely strong team .. really strong see your problem you still judge by today standard (P.S as for Greece , please remember that they did win the Europa league 2 years later and they were not beating shit , they...

Yes but i cannot say it was because of them but due to the awesome competition , than most of them left and Arsenal continue to be a joke I mean they were the same core of the invincible , same coach , same method.. nothing changed (sorry forgot to add Kanu to the list of names too ) the change...

also take into consideration back than it was a two group stage so it was a lot harder than now where luck can play it's part for you to qualify over one game you had first group stage , second group stage than the quarter final - semi final than final

ehm since you say you watched that period you should remember they reached it twice the one you refer to they also beat Liverpool and Roma to qualify and beat Pana before they met us and lost and the first one was our 8th CL when they lost to Valencia in the semi-final ;) and they met Chelsea...

I agree with that completely.. they still reached two semi-finals As for Arsenal again , it's the same team that was the "INVINCIBLE " later on.. basically when you look @ Arsenal and how they crashed you would say they were crap but they were not simply the competition was so good I mean any...

Barca was not as demised as you want them to be.. again they were strong but not as strong to compete with the stronger teams till the end .. reaching the semi-final was their high end I totally disagree about any of the teams being asleep during that period.. if there was dominance it was due...

Fairy tale in the times of the galactico .. this was the high of Leeds Utd Ditto for Arsenal it wasn't just Henry/Bergkamp the line up for example in 2001 had Bergamp, Ashley Cole, Patrick Vieira, Robert Pirès, Fredrik Ljungberg,Sylvain Wiltord, Thierry Henry Giovanni van Bronckhorst ...

Super Depor were a great team in Europe and in la liga.. but as i explained you are not playing weak teams you are playing very strong teams all over Europe Leeds was quite good and they ended up 4th in the year they reached the semi-final so your point is ? that was one awesome team of leeds...

I mean you would look @ la liga and say it will be either Barca or Real look from 98 to 2003/2004 you cannot even put money on them..easily 5-6 strong teams can win it