Search results

And it means more teams in EPL are succesfull in CL as opposed to one in Spain, France and Germany. Agreed.

No it isnt.. we are talking about teams at their peak in a league. Irrelevant where that team then falls to and other teams rise up. No one is arguing Chelsea have been at top constantly in last 10 years.. but when they are is relevant. Again.. when was EPL top era in mid 00s? Three...

Yes they 'took turns' and had x3 as many winners of CL as any other countries whos teams couldnt do enough to 'take turns'. Agreed. When was the EPL golden era in mid 00s? What years we talking here?

As opposed to Spain, Germany and France who never took any turns and one team won CL. And no they didnt take turns EPL teams defeated other EPL teams in finals etc. Not happening elsewhere in same time. When was the mid 00s golden era for EPL?

3 teams being the best in Europe is more than any other league has had in that time frame. Also defeated finalists on multiple occassions so yes at the same time. Moan about 2 teams while no other league even has more than one team winning it. When was the mid 00s golden era you are referring...

Again... Barca, Real, Bayern and PSG are signing players from mid to lower EPL teams. Didnt happen back then.

Again.. Chelsea were the top spending club in world in that time. When are you claiming was this time that EPL was at its most dominant? What seasons? Even if I think it was better then it makes no difference to any point made.

Money absolutely plays a huge part. You are speaking nonsense. Real, Barca, Bayern & PSG are taking players from mid to lower EPL teams and they are amongst some of their best players. This absolutely was not happening in 05/06 etc.

Few in EPL competed at top of CL? There have been x3 different winners of CL in last ten years and multiple beaten finalists. No other league has that. Liverpool have won the CL and been to a final since anyone in Spain bar Real got to a final. No is saying same teams dominate every year or...

No that doesnt explain the relevance of why you are asking to compare eras. I could think EPL was better then or now and it would not change any point made. United were the biggest spenders for vast majority of Fergies time there and likes of Drogba ended up at Chelsea due to a billionaire...

But you dont want to compare teams. You only think who wins counts. There have been x3 winners from EPL and more runners up than anyone else in recent years. EPL teams have beat other EPL teams to stop them winning it in finals etc.

What is relevance of it either way?

No idea and dont see what relevance it has. When are you saying EPL teams performed better? Are you referring only to CL?

Literally EPL has x3 different winners of any other league in last 10 years and been 2 all EPL finals that EPL teams beat other teams to win it.

Come again and be clearer with the question.

Indeed it does... thats the point. So any country that wins CL has the teams across board in that competition that year.. that the logic?

No that makes PSG better than them.. not the top teams in France better than Barca/Real as a whole. EPL has had x3 teams win CL in last 10 years. No other leagues had more than 1. More 'elite teams' is the point if want to look at CL winners. Not that they have the best every season or are...

Real have been best team in Europe and been beaten a number of times by EPL teams. Two of the last three for example. Real went out 5-1 to Arsenal and 5-1 to City in two of last three also. Doesnt make La Liga top teams the best as a whole. By your logic the French league had the best top...

No. Real as the one team yes but that doesnt cover all the top teams in a league.

No last season.. you said Liverpool and Real and scoffed at us who said likes of PSG looked very good. Fact is Real have been best side in Europe across last 10 years.... doenst change a single point made.