Luis Diaz

Diaz has 15 scorer in 16 games
Rashford 13 scorer in 14 games

Both have a really good impact and both have the same base salary but one of them costed 70 million. Rashford is clearly the better deal

Number wise Rashy >> he reached these scoring points in a struggling team

Diaz dribbling is amazing though and would help us a lot but doesnt look like we made a mistake with getting Rashy, considering also as Sito said Diaz cost 70 mio
 

MonteCuler

Well-known member
Props to Deco

Incredible idea. And even when practically everyone was against the signing he kept pushing for Diaz

Wish it materliazed. This guy is not just a very good dribbler but also incredible off the ball

That goal was pure class. Most players would not even attempt saving that ball let alone dribbling past player while on ground and then shooting from that angle
 

jamrock

Senior Member
Almost no one thought that, everyone thought he was a better profile but too old for the money Liverpool want, when we already have raphinha who is a similar age.

Nico was better because he was younger & has more upside.

Rashford because it's a loan.

But 90% of post here said he was the better profile of the 3 for the team.
 
Last edited:

MonteCuler

Well-known member
I thought he would be a solid signing but asking price was too much. Now honestly I don't think so

But who knows if even we could afford him
 

serghei

Senior Member
Maybe we were all wrong and Don Deco was right for willing to pay a lot of money for him. :lol:

Money we don't have though. Bayern don't pay big money easily either. Diaz is a top player. How much did he cost anyway, much more than 60-70 which is a fair market price for a player like this?

Our problem was money though, not that we didn't want him. If we had the money, he'd be here.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top