source?His release clause in two years will be what it is now again
source?His release clause in two years will be what it is now again
You mean 87M€ (the rumored new release clause) will seem like 58M€ in 2 years time?His release clause in two years will be close to what it is now.
They raised it with “more than 50% percent no?”source?
around 67. Given also economic inflation, not too far off from what you would need to pay for him in 2 years regardless.You mean 87M€ (the rumored new release clause) will seem like 58M€ in 2 years time?
Where did you get 67 from? We know of the >50% increase already. I'm guessing it's at 100m.around 67. Given also economic inflation, not too far off from what you would need to pay for him in 2 years regardless.
Okay but that release clause lowers every years.Where did you get 67 from? We know of the >50% increase already. I'm guessing it's at 100m.
Same Real Madrid chasing Mbappe like an obsessed person for around 8 years. They got done so wrong back in 2022 and it’s the same to what happened to us. Except he’s Mbappe and in his prime, and ours is Nico and he’s not all that.He needs to stop making himself look like a clown every transfer window. Every year it is a circus with this guy.
City, Liverpool, Real Madrid...this is how you get transfers done in a professional manner.
It's been evident since the start of last season that this team needs fullback depth and a left winger as critical needs in the team.
It's crazy that it still needs to be a circus with this fat bozo for something that should have been in planning a year ago.
It does?Okay but that release clause lowers every years.
Alik implied nico would be stuck at Bilbao for long time with his new contract. I argued not necessarily. His release clause in 2 years would be getting around to what pay now. If top clubs truly interested would pay it.
We were his second option? Then what tipped the scale for him to sign that contract?
Like you say I think he's had that offer on the table a while.
I think Barca would be his first option and that's why Athletic also wanted to challenge the possibility of us signing him, thus eliminating Nico's first option so he would stay.
Thought it does as to reflect value of contract which depreciates with time.It does?
Except they were dealing with PSG who don't sell their players and he is one of the best players in the world who has no equivalent and PSG paying him a fortune.Same Real Madrid chasing Mbappe like an obsessed person for around 8 years. They got done so wrong back in 2022 and it’s the same to what happened to us. Except he’s Mbappe and in his prime, and ours is Nico and he’s not all that.
Khaled and I are of same ilk reasoningwise.There was probably a number he wanted from Bilbao, they were hesitant to meet.
He used us, they folded and gave it to him, and he signed.
In a way, he had Bilbao as his number one option, but as long as they meet a certain demands.
Barca was plan B, he negotiated with us, with hope to get Bilbao to give him what he wants, and if not, he joins.
Again, it makes no sense to sign 10 year contract, with 100M RC, in the 4th day of the official transfer market, because Barca didn't give him guarantees on 3rd of July.
You’re acting like Bilbao didn’t try everything possible to prevent Nico from going to Barça. They went as far as asking LaLiga to monitor Barcelona’s finances which has never been seen before from any club we tried to buy players from.Except they were dealing with PSG who don't sell their players and he is one of the best players in the world who has no equivalent and PSG paying him a fortune.
None of that is relevant to Nico. There are many options for LW players out there all of whom are equal or better than Nico who could have been easily bought in with good planning.