it's between one of the 3 this season.
But regardless 100m for him at 28, he will be 29 in December, is something any serious club would consider.
The athletic YouTube video I posted made a good point about mixing in players in their physical prime like him with youngsters so there is that aspect of it.
But if either part says I'm taking a the money, I couldn't be mad at it.
Question is who would replace him, in a world where there is no raph, a player like lookman makes more sense, than in a situation where we have both, similar profile player for half the money and you still have 50m+ to spend elsewhere.