How could city not afford 50 million for mats
How could city not afford 50 million for mats
JamDav1982
Senior Member
Because he is not worth that and they still have FFP to think about.
They dont have the money in it being a bottomless pit they can just pay any amount for a player.
Why didnt they pay it?
I thought the whole ffp thing was basically done away with. They could have looked at ter stegen being gk for the next 10 years and for transfer fee of 50 million works out at 5 mill per year weras with bravo they will maybe get three seasons and will be ready to replace him. Although if pep continues with his track record he will be gone then to
JamDav1982
Senior Member
No FFP hasnt been done away with and it was all over press how much City could spend to be within it.
Why did they bother haggling for Stones for so long if money no object?
F
Flavia
Guest
[tw]767818679912366080[/tw]
Pathetic.
God Serena
New member
Wish we'd hurry up and get it done with. He's already in Manchester, isn't he?
Blaugrana Man
New member
And yet, City apparently want £25m for Hart.
FCBarca
Mike the Knife
Having an opinion and defending it is fairly standard on a message board, I know you should know this better than most. I listen and take in other opinions but I have not been convinced by any other arguments because they've been merely conjecture - I am not wired to accept conjecture.
I believe Pep is the man many fans know him to be, the man he has been throughout his life - especially for Barcelona. But as they say, fans are a fickle lot - even cules
FCBarca
Mike the Knife
Of course they doubled his wages, he was on half of what Mats was on
Conjecture, Flavia - you can't cite one iota of proof. There is far more circumstantial evidence that supports the theory I suggested which is that both keepers wanted to be #1, a number of publications and speculation built upon that and linked both keepers to an agreement with City. The club responded to outcry (And polling, btw) about the keeper situation, overwhelmingly Mats and Bravo wasn't prepared to be #2 either. So once Hart was dropped, things fell into place.
Bottom line, we were not keeping both keepers - simple as.
Conjecture, Flavia - you can't cite one iota of proof. There is far more circumstantial evidence that supports the theory I suggested which is that both keepers wanted to be #1, a number of publications and speculation built upon that and linked both keepers to an agreement with City. The club responded to outcry (And polling, btw) about the keeper situation, overwhelmingly Mats and Bravo wasn't prepared to be #2 either. So once Hart was dropped, things fell into place.
Bottom line, we were not keeping both keepers - simple as.
F
Flavia
Guest
We would be keeping them both, if not for pep. Simple as that.
And Bravo signing for city is not proof? Rumors of pep tapping up both gks emerged in January. Pep played the biggest role in their unsettling. There's no conjecture there. You're just avoiding reality here.
JamDav1982
Senior Member
You claim things about the club all then time without any 'iota of proof'.
Anything negative about club with no proof you will lap up any thing about Pep you reject and hail him as greatest cule ever.
FCBarca
Mike the Knife
Rumours, like you say - so yes, by definition it is conjecture
Home of Barca Fans
