But anyway, not surprised. You admitted yourself that you don't know much about tactics and such, and as a result you are not fit to evaluate a player.
I said that I don't read books and articles about movement, how to avoid pressure, how to switch positions.
You don't need to graduate football classes on Harvard to see that Semedo is braindead in attack and has flaws which can never be fixed.
He is good for a mighty Anfield game or against Rm, Atletico and top sides.
In La liga, against Mickey Mouse clubs like Osasuna, he is one of the weakest links since we need to attack and create all the time.
I know, I know, you will say that if we had Frenkie-Arthur, we would create enough of chances.
But still, why have only 2-3 creative players when you can have 6?
Why have 1 guy who can score if you can have 5?
CL and La liga require different approaches.
In a match like yesterday, we could have survived and won with Busi-Rafinha-Cou midfield.
Yet, you can't do that on Anfield.
Roberto is better against Osasuna.
Semedo is better for Anfield.
You guys have lost a touch with reality with obsession with Anfield.
If we will play easy matches with a lineup which would be good for Anfield, we will never win La Liga.
At Anfield, play with players who are good against Liverpool.
Against Osasuna, play players who will have 70% of possession, who will create, dribble and score.
For Anfield, you need tall defenders to defend against Liverpool's corners.
For Osasuna, you don't need that.
For Liverpool, you need a team of technical players who can run a lot.
For Osasuna you don't.
Here you can field a slower, technical, less combative team, who will create 8-10 chances due to a pure difference in quality and that's it.
On Anfield, you need 100s of different things which you don't need at all at Pamplona.
Semedo is one of those things.
Again, you don't need a Harvard degree to figure out that.
