I'm not saying it wasn't mutual consent officially, obviously it is because of the contract termination and the money. I'm just saying they did it that way to save what's left of their reputation. By the way, how exactly would any of them benefit from a classic sacking? This way, Mourinho is not as humiliated as he could have been, and the club gets to keep the 20 mil. It's a well-designed strategy to keep everyone happy. You're saying that as if Mourinho's exit doesn't have anything to do with how bad he was. He's leaving, that is, the contract was terminated, that is, he's sacked, because he wasn't successful. They did it with mutual consent to favor both parties as much as possible. Are you actually implying that this is not the reason he's leaving?