I'm glad you're bringing up Neymar now since your agenda has been exposed. You laughably downplay Hazard to big up Neymar but that's pathetic.
Since you're appealing to goals to somehow prove Neymar is a better player, how many goals did Iniesta score in his best seasons at Barcelona? Or Laudrup before him? Most prolific scorer does not equal best player, surely a Barcelona fan should know this better than others.
If you want to argue Neymar is a better goalscorer than Hazard, know what I'll grant you that. They are different players after all. But that's NOT my argument. Or my initial point. Since you brought up Neymar, then okay. I contend that Hazard is a better footballer than Neymar. He's more talented, he has more ability than the Brazilian and has outperformed him at Chelsea. He's also been more consistent than Neymar. There's no way the Neymar I've seen at Barcelona could do what Hazard has done for Chelsea over the years.
Neymar should be scoring 50 goals in that Barcelona side playing next to Messi and Suarez! He's supposed to have so much space. The media hype him up to be the successor to Messi but he's not nearly as good as Ronaldinho. You claim Hazard scored 19 in 52 but how many of those were him coming off the bench in cup competitions for example? You see, unlike you, I actually watch all of Chelsea's games and I know how good Hazard was that season. That season he was the most creative attacking midfielder in Europe (creating in excess of 100+ chances for his teammates from open play which is still unprecedented since that stat has been compiled. If Hazard had better teammates, he'll have had 30+ assists that season) and established himself as the best dribbler in the world. Neymar scored a lot of tap-ins from Messi's brilliance. I give him credit for actually being a great poacher in 2014/15 but Hazard was more brilliant for Chelsea that season. He was the centre-piece of a title winning team. Neymar scored more goals, yes, but Lampard scored more goals than Iniesta in his prime. Are you going to argue Lampard was better than Iniesta?
The biggest advantage Neymar has over Hazard is that he plays for such an incredibly strong team like Barcelona. In 2014/15, Mourinho at Chelsea packed the bus like mad in the champions league big games. Hazard was essentially made to play as a left back against PSG while Neymar had all the space created by Messi's magic and Luis Suazez's presence to make runs in behind and poach goals. THAT was Neymar's 2014/15 run in a nutshell. I actually watched the games so I know what I'm talking about. What will Neymar have done under similar circumstances Hazard had to deal with under Mourinh's laughably defensive tactics? Nothing! No attacking player would thrive. So let's be fair.
Neymar is top 5? According to who? Maybe in 2014/15 he was but certainly not this season. When you have the same amount goals as Sergio Ramos in the league playing next to Messi and Suarez and when the point of Neymar is supposed to be his goalscoring (according to you appealing to that), then how can you claim with a straight face he's top 5?
But back to Hazard, you claim he doesn't perform anywhere near his potential, yet he's arguably outpeformed Neymar for Barcelona. So what exactly is Hazard's potential according to you? It must be really out of this universe considering what Hazard has already achieved in his career.
Also, 6-0 to Barcelona versus Alaves. Just like 5-1 to Leganes, 5-0 to Las Palmas, 4-0 to Eibar. These are the stat padding games that have inflated Neymar's goalscoring stats while Hazard is picking up the ball from the centre-circle and dribbling past Arsenal's midfield and defence to decide league titles
