Nelson Semedo
- Thread starter DonAK
- Start date
EdmondDantes
New member
Poor but he gets no trust since the 4th captain must always play. Valverde's hierarchy folks.
Armchair Expert
Banned
He was given plenty of trust over the summer with the announcement of Roberto playing in midfield. How much more trust does he really deserve with these types of performances?
Messigician
Senior Member
Im still waiting for arguments what exactly was so poor?!
And what exactly was better in 2nd half.
Ossasuna pressed hard at the begining. Midfield wasnt present and so its logical that pur defense gets problems.
Alba had the same problems on the other side cause osssuna was attacking our wings constantly.
But ofc in this forum they only see a single player not the whole Problem. We had the same problems in several games before when we got pressed.
I even say semedo bacame a lot calmer in this pressing situations and solves them better.
In the end valverde only made this sub cause it was 0-1 and everyone knows bob is the more offensive. Ofc nothing really changed in this regard in 2nd half...
And what exactly was better in 2nd half.
Ossasuna pressed hard at the begining. Midfield wasnt present and so its logical that pur defense gets problems.
Alba had the same problems on the other side cause osssuna was attacking our wings constantly.
But ofc in this forum they only see a single player not the whole Problem. We had the same problems in several games before when we got pressed.
I even say semedo bacame a lot calmer in this pressing situations and solves them better.
In the end valverde only made this sub cause it was 0-1 and everyone knows bob is the more offensive. Ofc nothing really changed in this regard in 2nd half...
EdmondDantes
New member
Point taken but in reality it was all a lie, wasn't it?
Who got booted off the game and who played right-back once again yesterday?
One half is enough for Valverde to dispose of the players who don't belong to the club de amigos.
The Observer
New member
He is a really average player, could plug in 30 other rightbacks in world football in his place and there would be no difference. At one point under pressure he just booted the ball out of play aimlessly.
People here acted like he was prime Alves sitting on the bench when Roberto started over him.
If clubs are willing to pay a serious sum for him let him go and try someone else, no way this guy will become a Barca starting RB for years to come.
People here acted like he was prime Alves sitting on the bench when Roberto started over him.
If clubs are willing to pay a serious sum for him let him go and try someone else, no way this guy will become a Barca starting RB for years to come.
BBZ8800
Senior Member
Last season EV was attacked because he didn't play 5 gems and he preferred Club de amigos and Roberto instead of them.
EV's mistakes from last season in terms of players according to our forum:
1. Why is Dembele not playing? Why is he subbed the first all the time?
= we know the answer now
2. Why is EV not playing Malcom in Malcom-false 9 Messi-Dembele trio?
= we know the answer now
3. Why is EV playing his loverboy Roberto over an insane player Semedo?
= lol
4. Arthur
5. Alena
Till now, EV is at 3/3 success rate (Dembele, Malcom, Semedo).
With Arthur and Alena, over time he will probably end at 80% or 100% success rate (4/5 or 5/5).
Fans will have 0/5 or 1/5 success rate.
** This is just a random daily interesting story, not related to anyone.
Don't you guys lose nerves or something over this post 😉
EV's mistakes from last season in terms of players according to our forum:
1. Why is Dembele not playing? Why is he subbed the first all the time?
= we know the answer now
2. Why is EV not playing Malcom in Malcom-false 9 Messi-Dembele trio?
= we know the answer now
3. Why is EV playing his loverboy Roberto over an insane player Semedo?
= lol
4. Arthur
5. Alena
Till now, EV is at 3/3 success rate (Dembele, Malcom, Semedo).
With Arthur and Alena, over time he will probably end at 80% or 100% success rate (4/5 or 5/5).
Fans will have 0/5 or 1/5 success rate.
** This is just a random daily interesting story, not related to anyone.
Don't you guys lose nerves or something over this post 😉
MTL_Barca
Well-known member
Don't forget his 2/2 CL embarrassments, might even make it 3/3. GOAT.
Why dont you go in the Arthur thread and apologize for another major BBZ Fail?!
BBZ8800
Senior Member
You can make a distinction:
1. Bad in tactics
2. Bad in team's movement
3. GOAT in judging fraud overhyped players, unlike fans
BBZ8800
Senior Member
Wait, a guy played good for 30 minutes and his faith is decided?
Cool story.
Griezz played good last week as a false 9, this week he returned to shit and for now he has 2 good games as a 9, and 5 horrible games.
Only 7 days ago, people wrote the same, like: Bbz, you said that Griez can't play as a No9.
So, hold your horses, mate.
serghei
Senior Member
[MENTION=16942]BBZ8800[/MENTION], lol. You just never give up man.
Malcom performed very well whenever trusted. How exactly was the manager right in his case, when he played well whenever trusted. Was one of our best players vs Madrid in the Copa, when Messi was injured, and in the next game he also played well and scored vs Villareal away a nice goal. The reward? Permabenched when Messi recovered from injury. Played some meaningless games at the end, but when he was trusted again at half time vs Valencia, the man, again, proved he deserved more chances. Even vs Liverpool away he was noticed when he came on, and look more dangerous than Coutinho and the other Valverde favorites. Man deserved chances, which he didn't get. And your conclusion is that Vaverde was right about him.
Hilariously bad logic.
He was sold for 40m btw Malcom. Not loaned for a year or something.
Semedo is a top player. That is why a world class manager like Simeone wanted him this summer. If he was a bad player as you say, he wouldn't have had offers from our rivals in CL, Atletico and PSG, two top 10 teams.
We could have sold him for profit, but we decided to keep him.
But anyway, not surprised. You admitted yourself that you don't know much about tactics and such, and as a result you are not fit to evaluate a player.
Malcom performed very well whenever trusted. How exactly was the manager right in his case, when he played well whenever trusted. Was one of our best players vs Madrid in the Copa, when Messi was injured, and in the next game he also played well and scored vs Villareal away a nice goal. The reward? Permabenched when Messi recovered from injury. Played some meaningless games at the end, but when he was trusted again at half time vs Valencia, the man, again, proved he deserved more chances. Even vs Liverpool away he was noticed when he came on, and look more dangerous than Coutinho and the other Valverde favorites. Man deserved chances, which he didn't get. And your conclusion is that Vaverde was right about him.
Hilariously bad logic.He was sold for 40m btw Malcom. Not loaned for a year or something.
Semedo is a top player. That is why a world class manager like Simeone wanted him this summer. If he was a bad player as you say, he wouldn't have had offers from our rivals in CL, Atletico and PSG, two top 10 teams.
We could have sold him for profit, but we decided to keep him.
But anyway, not surprised. You admitted yourself that you don't know much about tactics and such, and as a result you are not fit to evaluate a player.
Last edited:
Home of Barca Fans
