Nucky
Senior Member
Here's the thing with Nico though.
It's 60m the club have to pay in cash because Athletic won't negotiate. Paying a transfer fee in a lump sum might affect our FFP/finances more negatively than paying one in in installments as most fees usually are paid. Especially if the club want to take out a loan to pay for it instead of using whatever cash reserves they have.
Then it's his salary as well. Athletic are not a poor club and their way of retaining talent is by paying them very well. He's on a very high salary there which we'll probably have to match at the very least.
Question then comes down to how highly do you rate Nico Williams to pay 60m in cash + 15m per year in salary before taxes. It would make him a top five highest paid player at the club unless he's willing to reduce his salary.
Signing someone like Rashford or even Luis Diaz for a lower fee + lower salary gives the club 2-3 years to see how the market develops and possibly either find the next great talent at the position or sign someone better. Like could Barcola be available in two years with the tough competition in Paris or someone better?
I cannot for sure say which option is better. All these players have their flaws.
The most important thing is to get a LW who is quick or explosive and is good 1v1, and is capable of scoring goals as well. Not expecting a high volume scorer, but someone that is capable.
Well anybody that is following the financial situtation at the club in the last 5 years would realize that but still you presented good arguments why Rashford is much more realistic signing than Nico Gonzales or other names that were mentioned in regard to LW signing... In the end Rashford will probably end in Barca to save his career and his last chance to play european football at top club specially at such a hot club as Barca currently is given the financial situtation and even that depends on departures.. I guess first thing will be selling deadwood like Fati,Christiansen and then thinking about possible signings..