La Liga Round 35: Barca - Real 4-3

Who wins?

  • Barca

    Votes: 19 70.4%
  • Draw

    Votes: 4 14.8%
  • Real

    Votes: 4 14.8%

  • Total voters
    27
Here it was seen that we have no defense to win the UCL, very big mistakes were made, Real escaped alone about 3 times with the goalkeeper in the last 10 minutes of the match, a little more and it would have cost us the victory.
 

NKMaribor

Active member
I couldn't stomach the last few mins and the disallowed goal, let alone the first 90 mins.

Before this match, RM TV put out a whole piece on the ref to straight up bend decisions. This must be stopped.

Lapota. You need to lawyer up.

Laporta is already lawyered up. To his neck. Lol!

But i understand it. I do. I expected 10:0. You did also. It was a golden chance this years, considering Madrid has no defense.
 
I don't think it should be a pen if you shoot full power at the defender from 1 yard distance who has his hands on his body and not extended. That's a fair call.

Ruling the Barca goal out in the same match is a joke though. And what was that with no replay of their first goal. Looked offside to me.

My main beef with the stuff that is in our hands is that you dominate this much with your opponent's heads dropped and entire backline missing and yet they are one youngster misshot away from equalizing. Why does this team only play serious after 2 goals down these days?
 

Porque

Senior Member
I don't think it should be a pen if you shoot full power at the defender from 1 yard distance who has his hands on his body and not extended. That's a fair call.

Ruling the Barca goal out in the same match is a joke though. And what was that with no replay of their first goal. Looked offside to me.

My main beef with the stuff that is in our hands is that you dominate this much with your opponent's heads dropped and entire backline missing and yet they are one youngster misshot away from equalizing. Why does this team only play serious after 2 goals down these days?

We need to look at this a different way. With the rule set up like this, the defender can hold his arms slightly wide and have a bigger area of blockage.

Ball hits the arm? No problem, the arm was in a natural position anyways.

Either give an indirect freekick for preventing a ball from getting through to the target with an illegal body part, or better, go back to the old days where defenders had to clasp their hands behind their back to stop them from being in play.
 
We need to look at this a different way. With the rule set up like this, the defender can hold his arms slightly wide and have a bigger area of blockage.

Ball hits the arm? No problem, the arm was in a natural position anyways.

Either give an indirect freekick for preventing a ball from getting through to the target with an illegal body part, or better, go back to the old days where defenders had to clasp their hands behind their back to stop them from being in play.

Yeah but his arm wasn't "slightly wide". It was completely tucked. That's why the refs needed so long to make up their minds. For me that's fine.

Far more shady to not show a single replay of their first goal and whether it was offside. I still don't know if it was or not.
 

snowy

Well-known member
We need to look at this a different way. With the rule set up like this, the defender can hold his arms slightly wide and have a bigger area of blockage.

Ball hits the arm? No problem, the arm was in a natural position anyways.

Either give an indirect freekick for preventing a ball from getting through to the target with an illegal body part, or better, go back to the old days where defenders had to clasp their hands behind their back to stop them from being in play.

That's the thing though, even commentator said it wasn't in a natural position.

Old ways are best otherwise defender will pick the free kick option if can prevent a goal 🤔
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top