I just told you the official reasons, you don't have to like them, but I understand them. Conflict of interest is above everything and all logic.
I am fine with the purpose behind the policy, but prefer stricter internal controls and checks and balances over our President having to step down for 6 months and handing over the keys to his BFF. This doesn't inspire "more" confidence in me.
What Yuste does or not for Laporta during this time is a different matter. We're talking strictly about the general club's politics.
But it matters unless you believe they are truly independent from one another. Yuste wants Laporta to win as much as Laporta wants to win, for if Laporta loses... so does Yuste.
That is hardly independence.
And again, heavily limiting Laporta's power during that period is practically the same as stepping down for the time being.
I agree, so if it's the same, why not just let him stay in charge and introduce checks and balances to ensure fair elections. Rhetorical question so we don't go on all night on this.
I told you. Each financial year has tons of financial and contractual bindings and responsibilities, that a new board obviously doesn't want to take over as their own.
Committing to new contractual bindings and obligations would be limited under Yuste too, I assume, rendering Laporta's temporary resignation useless.