32 - Héctor Fort

[jamrock]

At least 50m

 

[draconifire]

Pau went for 15m, Fort needs to be at least 20m if not 25m.

 

[Andresito]

Imo Fort has shown close to nothing for the first team. Don't think we will get more than 10m, especially if there's a buyback.

 

[Titan98]

Pau went for 15m, Fort needs to be at least 20m if not 25m.

Never as said bevore, he has shown nothing, just that he is bad defensively. I think 5-10 million is a fair price for an unproven player.

 

[jamrock]

He showed enough the season under Xavi and played well a few times under flick.

Chelsea sells him for 25m easy, for us.

4m max smh

 

[draconifire]

Never as said bevore, he has shown nothing, just that he is bad defensively. I think 5-10 million is a fair price for an unproven player.

If he was going anywhere else, I would agree with you, a 10m ish price is probably justified for him.

But it's a prem team, we need to fleece them. It's as simple as that.
I would rather not sell him to a prem team for less than 20m, even if it means he stays with the squad.

 

[Titan98]

He showed enough the season under Xavi and played well a few times under flick.

Chelsea sells him for 25m easy, for us.

4m max smh

You mean the season under xavi where he played just 10 games with gametime of 570 minutes? He played more under flick last season.

 

[Titan98]

If he was going anywhere else, I would agree with you, a 10m ish price is probably justified for him.

But it's a prem team, we need to fleece them. It's as simple as that.
I would rather not sell him to a prem team for less than 20m, even if it means he stays with the squad.

Yeah but what can we do, we need the money

 

[jamrock]

You mean the season under xavi where he played just 10 games with gametime of 570 minutes? He played more under flick last season.

Yea that season he showed enough to get old for good money, players from other team played less games and got sold for more

Which is the point

 

[Titan98]

Yea that season he showed enough to get old for good money, players from other team played less games and got sold for more

Which is the point

Other teams doesnt need transfer fees for player registration. Why do you mean real madrid get higher fees for their players? Because they never need the money immediately.
This statement discribes our situation because more clubs suffer in la liga:

Ángel Torres (Getafe president): “We’ve given away Omar Alderete, one of the best centre-backs in La Liga, to a newly promoted Premier League club for peanuts just so that I could have 16-17 players registered by Sunday.When you call La Liga, all they tell you is ‘sell, sell’. They don’t now even let me use personal guarantees. Our league is the laughing stock of Europe.”

Real madrid doesnt have this problem because perez managed the club well while we failed

 

[Titan98]

And another positive example is athletic bilbao, their transfer strategy lets them give their players very high contracts like top clubs and holding them for years.

 

[jamrock]

Other teams doesnt need transfer fees for player registration. Why do you mean real madrid get higher fees for their players? Because they never need the money immediately.
This statement discribes our situation because more clubs suffer in la liga:

Ángel Torres (Getafe president): “We’ve given away Omar Alderete, one of the best centre-backs in La Liga, to a newly promoted Premier League club for peanuts just so that I could have 16-17 players registered by Sunday.When you call La Liga, all they tell you is ‘sell, sell’. They don’t now even let me use personal guarantees. Our league is the laughing stock of Europe.”

Real madrid doesnt have this problem because perez managed the club well while we failed

Fair point

 

[Porque]

Dani R is also on his way to Valencia on loan. They want a purchase option. They can f off with there pauperness. But we will probably give them one of 0m.