Would give him motm for the goals but still very meagre contribution to general distribution and ball progression. Felt he left Pedri to connect the lines in both ends and sort of just stood in the middle. Fair perhaps if he's meant to play it safe until more comfortable.
Impressed me with a few good defensive actions but other times felt he was too lax with pressure around our box.
Bernal was instructed not to receive the ball from our defenders or to advance it to our attackers?Both were clearly instructed to play that way and Bernal waiting between lines more often and to get forward.
Bernal was instructed not to receive the ball from our defenders or to advance it to our attackers?
But Pedri was clearly also most active of the two in getting the ball to attackers. Or would you dispute that?He was instructed to play higher than Pedri clearly.
Wasnt just 'leaving' Pedri to do it and 'just standing in middle'.
But Pedri was clearly also most active of the two in getting the ball to attackers. Or would you dispute that?
So what is exactly is your disagreemtn with the statement that Pedri was more active in both picking it up from defense and advancing to the attack (ie. connecting the lines in both ends), while Bernal remained more inactive in the middle?Because he is the better player and also the one quite clearly getting the ball deeper to try and progress it.
So what is exactly is your disagreemtn with the statement that Pedri was more active in both picking it up from defense and advancing to the attack (ie. connecting the lines in both ends), while Bernal remained more inactive in the middle?
A euphemism for not committing to making himself available to receive the ball in uncomfortable positions on the one hand, and on the other lacking courage to make more direct forward plays. I didn't mean that he was literally standing still for the whole game.You made out Bernal was just standing around not doing much and left Pedri to it.