20 - Dani Olmo

[Iniesta Ultra]

The fact of the matter is, Fermin has been the better player for a while now, and his signing really is looking like the misstep a lot of us thought it was.

he's just mimicking donkey's stat padding in a smaller way

dude will never be an elite footballer worthy of starting next to Yamal on a regular basis

 

[MasQueCulé]

His performance are problematic in the last few matchs of the season.

Hope the inter season gonna be benificial to him.

But i'm not so scared about him for the next season. His talent are undeniable.

 

[Windhook]

I'm not losing my mind over his current form. My concern is his injury history, he gained a momentum early in the season and then the first injury happened.

 

[Total-Football]

His profile is extreamly close to fermin Lopez. I think if the management knew Fermin would reach his current level they wouldn't have signed Olmo. I feel there is some redundancy in having both ! Well.. Fermin even has the availability plus.

 

[jamrock]

Fermin showed this exact level at the Olympics, it's not the Euros, but he showed he can be replied on to deliver as he did last season.

So that's not the reason they bought olmo, almo was a good market opportunity, that as been a good signing and will only get better before being replaced in 2-3 years by someone else.

 

[khaled_a_d]

I wonder if they will take a look at the City offer. If he himself would consider it.

His profile is extreamly close to fermin Lopez. I think if the management knew Fermin would reach his current level they wouldn't have signed Olmo. I feel there is some redundancy in having both ! Well.. Fermin even has the availability plus.

Fermin is a level below Olmo tbh, Olm is more capable in deciding games if we are being fair. He was a personal request by Flick who probably appreciated his profile and it showed why this year

 

[Andresito]

Not sure how much City would pay for a guy like Olmo, certainly not more than we paid for him. And then I don't think club will consider it.

 

[khaled_a_d]

We paid 55M for Olmo, I think something around 70M is what we can get for him.

 

[jamrock]

We only have 3 unsellable players, if the number is right 70+ add-ons.

I'm selling

 

[vegitot]

Trade him with Kevin. Win - win.

 

[Kul_z]

Trade him with Kevin. Win - win.

Kevin? Kdb? Kdb is free agent this summer

 

[serghei]

Not sure how much City would pay for a guy like Olmo, certainly not more than we paid for him. And then I don't think club will consider it.

70m for sure. Or they can take a hike. Club has no incentive to sell tbh, unless for a big offer. I'm perfectly fine if the club keeps Olmo.

 

[Joan]

60 for Nico and 70 for Olmo? I don’t think so.

 

[xXKonan]

I'm sure they'll try and offer a completely cooked Bernardo Silva+20 Million for Olmo.

 

[DonAK]

If you're Dani Olmo why would you join Man City with a neurotic Pep Guardiola?