10 - Lamine Yamal

Maradona37

Well-known member
These 5 vs these 5, who wins? @Maradona37 🤔🤔🤔
View attachment 13474
That isn't even a debate :lol:

The technical ability and genius of those players is infinitely greater than all the Cristiano Ronaldo versions. And he's never even been impressive for Portugal, Juve, and his time as a kid at Sporting is meaningless.

But I know you're just trolling lol. Might as well ask if the 5 best versions of me can beat Pele, Di Stefano, Beckenbauer, Garrincha and Georgie Best. It's about as likely ie zero chance in both cases.
 
That isn't even a debate :lol:

The technical ability and genius of those players is infinitely greater than all the Cristiano Ronaldo versions. And he's never even been impressive for Portugal, Juve, and his time as a kid at Sporting is meaningless.

But I know you're just trolling lol. Might as well ask if the 5 best versions of me can beat Pele, Di Stefano, Beckenbauer, Garrincha and Georgie Best. It's about as likely ie zero chance in both cases.

A post which you can only dislike 👎👎👎
 

Maradona37

Well-known member
No personal insults pls, there are no proves about that 😬

Anyways, lets dont go off topic here...
Yeah that was a bit harsh.

Obviously you overrate Ronaldo, but I know you aren't the type to defend him if it was proved it's true. Others would but not you as you are a decent guy.

It doesn't change though that those 5 Ronaldos against those players wouldn't be a contest. Also because the 5 Ronaldos would be a worse team with far worse link up than those Barca 10s.
 

jormatar

Active member
No personal insults pls, there are no proves about that 😬

Anyways, lets dont go off topic here...

You don't pay 400,000 to random woman if you know you are innocent to the allegations.
 

You don't pay 400,000 to random woman if you know you are innocent to the allegations.

Bro you should know 400.000 for CR7 is like 0.10€ for us, he was probably just annoyed from future rumours and prevent them 😬
 

serghei

Senior Member
It's common to pay money to avoid scandals for rich athletes. The "hush money" didn't prove jack shit.

He said-she said thing, impossible to prove, but logic dictates this is a type of case where woman tries to get rich. The fact that she got paid goes in that direction also.

If she didn't take a cent... and gone forward with the case... things would have looked differently.
 

Maradona37

Well-known member
It's common to pay money to avoid scandals for rich athletes. The "hush money" didn't prove jack shit.

He said-she said thing, impossible to prove, but logic dictates this is a type of case where woman tries to get rich. The fact that she got paid goes in that direction also.

If she didn't take a cent... and gone forward with the case... things would have looked differently.
This is pathetic and why plenty of women are scared to speak up.
 
Last edited:

mc_lovin

Senior Member
It's common to pay money to avoid scandals for rich athletes. The "hush money" didn't prove jack shit.

He said-she said thing, impossible to prove, but logic dictates this is a type of case where woman tries to get rich. The fact that she got paid goes in that direction also.

If she didn't take a cent... and gone forward with the case... things would have looked differently.

He's guilty as fuck. No he said-she said thing.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top