Search results

Yes but now we are buying players that idiot Bartomeu likes, and he does not know shit about football. Griezmann as signining says it all. Hope so we will get one of them , but we will spend 100mill on shitty Martinez who scored 11 goals in league while Immobile scored 25 plus goals.

I don't see mythical Barca DNA where you have 100 precent passing and zero precent of defence. Pass on Camavinga. We need another player in midfield that will pass to Messi who is out of position. Then he will try to make pass to floop signing Lautaro who fails pass to another failer...

They are not club that have best players.

Why would you want fu*king kabak when you have todibo

Lets hope if they bring Lataro it will not be paying the clause. Give them shit players like it is their club.

We can get him , but I think this guy is not that good. Imagine CL 1/4 against some better team let say Liverpool or City, I would not rely too much on Emerson

Yeah , I am not happy with 111 million for Lautaro. Haaland is better name and proven goalscorer. He does not have myithical Barca DNA

Last report from Catalunya from Rac or someone. No money for Neymar . We are out from race for brazillian skinny fat boy Some good news :)

If keeping Coutinho means no Neymar , I would make him captain after Messi.

Sell that prick for 40 millions.

Well I would like something like this. But I think Busqets is starter for sure with De Jong and I am not sure if there is some realistic interest Kante. Of course these 3 at front....We are not close getting any of these as it seems now. We could get one of them. Griezmann is not going anywhere.

There is no much options for RB. I don't have anyone on my mind.

No, City give us 15 mil. I think it is obvious. Maybe he could be good at Barca, becausue Semedo is not so ofensive and people didn't like it.

If he wants to go then okey. 50mil I think it is fair price concidering City payed Cancelo 65. Cancelo plus 15 mil

Well getting rid of Coutinho for any player that would be good for 2 seasons is good. Kante is 29 , he is physical player that is truth. Anyone is better then Ndombele.

Becuase he does not use skills. He doesn't seem like great dribbler at tight space.

He is more wide player . I think we should go for him if Demebele goes. Trincao,Fati,Dembele,Messi,Suarez,Griezmann. If Trincao is going on loan then I would buy Ferran. Ferran,Kante and Upamecano. Nothig more

Getting this guy might not be bad idea . He could go, Chelsea wants Coutinho. We give them some cash, get rid of shit player like Coutinho and his high wages and you get beast for 3-4 years. Seems good to me.

We have to many players that can't ran, we would need then Makelele and prime Viera to cover space. Maybe they will get Kante...That would not be bad idea, giving them idiotic Coutinho plus some cash for Kante , on like 3-4 years deal. Getting rid of high salary player and getting beast.

Well I am just questioning why we are so for Lautaro and zero interest in Haaland? For that 100 mil price I think Haalanda might be better option. But he does not have mythical Barcelona DNA.