Search results

I assume loan deal?

All of this seems to be under the assumption we will be operating 1:1, which isn't bad news for folks who are obsessed with it. If we are using the 1:4 (or currently 40%) that means the whole income thing is irrelevent

I would call it impatience rather than shambles.

Dom is? I mean Lenglet is Barca reject who is a leech, Garcia is a mediocre at best. Out performing those 2 should be the minimum tbh.

32M + 5M for a 28 years old CM who is in his last year of contract.

Signed for 1.5M, sold for 12M. Math doesn't add up mate. In addition to sell on clause.

We have signed Olmo for same money, so yes he was correct. For all the things he said, people are hating him for saying the one truth he said.

I doubt someone can establish himself so quickly with NT tbh, NT coaches tens to be loyal to their no1 and don't change it easily. It will take some De Gea level of performances for MATS to lose the spot, not just a new GK to pop up. people forget that Neuer was supposed to be 3rd GK for...

Officially retired from NT

They wouldn't, those will ask to be registered and we didn't do that with Roque. Mokio choose Ajax youth over Barca B because he thought it is better development for him. Not money related.

Xavi 100% approved Roque move, by his own words. Bringing him early is what Xavi disapproved, but that after he encouraged the board to sign Roque a year earlier. Guiu is even worse, and was arguably the worst player in Chelsea in his debut.

It is one thing to believe Laporta is using the media or doing some mutual favours, it is another thing to believe everything written by the media came from him or the board. How does a Leao rumours help Laporta? Especially coming from F.Polo who has been awful this past months and shooting...

Which on paper is a renewal, so how is it going to be "not allowed". I mean, I get his point, but it isn't going to happen.

Only him and Fati are this type of deadweight. And there is no way you can ban renewal of players.

Same happened with Umtiti, with a termination option which we have exercised. It is essentially pre-arrangement for terminating his contract and how is the money is going to be paid. Most likely he is going on loan this year and contract will be terminated next summer but he will be continued...

There is a rumour of mutual interest between him and City. He will technically leave for free, as we won't get compensation. Cancelo loan deal will just be easier as it will cut the waiting game between us and City.

I mean after the last 3 years, I think it is fair to assume the club doesn't give a shit about the optics especially in August.

I think Gundogan is just an awful fit to what Flick wants to implement. Even when they were with the German NT IMHO. He is a CM, he is niether a pivot nor an attacking midfielder. This is why they want him out, he is surplus to the game plan, unlike when Xavi was here. And obviously we don't...

If their source is ActualiteBarca, then this is just made up

We are better keeping Fati than bringing Chiesa. At least Fati is a LW.