Search results

Barto knew how to get money in, but was poor to stupid or even unlucky when it came to transfers. Salaries were pure stupidity though. But even he would probably have got away with it if Covid didn't happen and some of the transfers were a success.

As Luft pointed out, Laporta ain't the savviest of business men. Rosell and Barto were both better at that. We were number one club in revenue before Covid, with Barto at the helm. Best in our history as a club. Don't know who is the better club president, or who was luckier between them.

716 overall mate.

Club is still used by the Catalan elites as a political tool. It is self sustainable with a bigger pull than many other clubs around. Real and Barca will never disappear as big clubs because of their geographical position and history. If ți comes to Barca not being able to compete financially...

You might want to go back and have a look at what Laporta left in 2010. https://edition.cnn.com/2010/SPORT/football/07/27/barcelona.debt.deloitte.spain/index.html#:~:text=New%20Barcelona%20club%20president%20Sandro,the%20Spanish%20champions'%20ailing%20finances. Same old shit at this club really.

I get what you're saying but 10M is not a big amount and still no one wants to pay that. Man Utd submits bid of 8M for Arnautovic, go figure. Why are people going with this lie about his 'low' salary. Depay gets 5M euros NET a season. More than Kounde, Pedri or Ter Stegen. 5M a season for...

Get rid of Pjanic and we have perfect depth for a 3 man midfield. Maybe a bit overloaded on the right interior position. But I guess Busquets will be replaced by Kessie/FDJ when needed.

Still flop in my view. Scored vs some bums, 0 goals in CL, got injured and by March he was a reserve. We got dumped out of CL with him as starter. Not all his fault, but tells you everything about his level. So good that the whole of Europe is fighting for his signature. Flop doesn't really...

He came for free and can sign a new contract with another club in 6 months. And truth is nobody wants to pay for him. He is a flop when you consider he lost his starting position and didn't achieve anything here. So instead of paying him for another season it is better we get rid.

why not try for rodri then? surely he would like to return to spain at some point.

romero might get a job in the pique administration. who knows...

yeah mate, i know. life ain't fair, but that's capitalism for you. don't like the sport and the whole charade around footballers and their undeserved earnings then turn off the tv or stop going to matches. also, don't know about them 'knowingly exploiting' the club. after all, they were owed...

Only fools dream about other people giving up money. If contract says the club ows him 200M then that's that. Stop living in a dream and go get a job. You'll see things differently when you're working for money.

US soccer fans don't count mate.

It was the right thing to do anyway. No point in paying him for a year while he warms the bench.

1. question makes no sense. club will make an offer that he either accepts or refuses. but i'm sure after the last fiasco both parties would want to be clear from the start on what is possible and what's not. 2. depends where he plays and the system we choose in order to accommodate him. right...

he's not really. people always come up with this story that it would ruin everything good we have done so far. it's bullshit tbf. buying a proper worldclass striker, getting some good wingers, buying a good CB, these were all transfers that should have happened when messi was here also. but we...

if he wins the WC he would be untouchable. can come here and play drunk every minute. don't think there would be any discussion about his legacy and all that shite.

he might win another ballon d'or once this season is finished. club will be hyped to get him. i think deep down everyone want to see this hollywood story of the prodigal son returning to happen(just like everyone would like to see the argentina vs portgual final at the WC). the problem stands...

link?