Search results

Huh? That is not the norm for World Cup winners.

https://twitter.com/rnvidss/status/1608258893146361857

Neither.

I think he'll come good. It's getting the chances in the first place that is the most difficult part.

Who should he have played ahead of?

He's not English. I wouldn't have a Scottish coach either, while we're at it.

This is patently untrue, unless you think it's by some cosmic coincidence that Germany chooses German coaches, Spain chooses Spanish coaches, and Italy chooses Italian coaches. I'm not even strictly averse to a foreign coach, I would be OK with Rodgers, but a German or Argentinian? Unthinkable...

My prediction: Upamecano does something mental, Argentina win.

A midfield of Modric, Rakitic and Brozovic beating a midfield of Henderson, Dele Alli and Lingard was not that sensational. It's amazing England were even in the game.

Ronaldo is not part of the best player ever debate, that didn't happen in the era or social media, and it's one player that shouldn't have played, not half a team. I don't think it's comparable.

What on Earth does one have to do with the other? They're our greatest rivals. It would be like Zidane coaching Barcelona. It's a no-go.

If Messi wins because the French squad were ill that will kinda taint his legacy. It'll be the only thing that gets brought up when his WC medal is mentioned.

Explain yourself.

An afternoon kick-off for a World Cup final seems wrong.

I will not accept a German or Argentinian coach. That is just pure lunacy.

Only a madman would put TAA against Mbappe when you have Walker at your disposal.

I think we did OK. They're world champions, they have a better team, and only the fine margins were the difference. I don't think Southgate can be blamed for this.

Barca academy product?