Search results

Both were unhappy. Bravo demanded to leave. Mats didn't. Everything else is you filling in the gaps yourself.

It was the club and Lucho's intention to keep both for at least another season. Bravo wanted to be the #1 keeper in all competitions and asked to leave. Nothing else matters. We did not sell Bravo because Mats whined. We sold Bravo because Bravo whined.

C-c-c-combo breaker!!!!!

The ways Lucho fucks up are becoming impossible to count now. This is worse than Tata Martino.

We sold Bravo to make Bravo comfortable. If you're going to rage at least rage about something that's actually true.

No, he's much worse than Mats even when Mats is at his worst.

Probably our best player on the night. It's interesting how even when he's playing well, the team is still so incredibly shit. Maybe he wasn't the problem all along. Huh.

Still waiting for Gomes to show us something and I'm starting to wonder if that day will ever come.

So inattentive that the ball comes right to him for a tap in and he doesn't realize it until the ball is already going wide. Where is this poacher's instinct I once heard people talk about? Even despite that this was easily his best performance for us.

His performances are inexcusable at this point. And this is coming from me. My lord, he's a shadow of the keeper he once was.

What a compelling argument.

Players like Song, Vermaelen, etc. can't be considered flops when they were expected to fail from the very beginning. Like who in their right mind actually expected anything from Vermaelen or Song (Who Tito admitted was signed to help cover for CB :lol:) But a player who was brought in to help...

Especially when the only starter quality midfilders you have are Busquets and Iniesta.

Hopefully when Lucho leaves this summer our new manager blocks this BS.

Just give him time! Ffs he hasn't even played a single game for us!

If we had Mathieu against Real Madrid he'd have probably had another shocker considering he's been injured since basically April/May and hasn't had a good appearance in the little time he was able to play since then. Overall I'd consider him to be a flop. His good performances have higher value...

Not really impressive predictions. Paco was a certain flop to anyone who didn't lick the nuts of any and all incoming players for the sake of "giving them time". Douglas was an obvious money laundering scheme, Arda was obviously a political signing, and Mathieu was a fossil when brought in...

4-3-3 is our identity, changing our formation for more than a single game here and there isn't anything more than pointless idealism.

He can play either side and he's often needed on the left, so he plays there. He's a tremendously hard worker in the vein of Puyol which makes his defending quite solid, but from what I've seen of him he's not much of an upgrade over Roberto offensively. He's honestly nowhere near Grimaldo but...

Watch him become our best sub for Messi at RW and everyone who supports every new player no matter what will say "he's a good RW backup so he's worth his spot on the team" even though we'd still need a competent RB.