Search results

It's simple, you can't :lol:

15m for what? Has no place in the first 11 and it's not looking good for him.

Wait, that's tonight?! Good to know :lol:

Who’s buying a LF?

The Venn diagram of people who write about Pep’s sexuality and those who comment on players’ looks and hairlines in other threads is a circle.

if we decide to go for him, he's ours. There is no way Arsenal is beating us to a player. Unless his name is Martin Zubimendi.

He is valued at 180m on Transfermarkt? :lol: :lol:

I would say more talented or better potential. Casado managed to translate his skills to the highest level and demonstrated that over a significant number of games. That's not a small feat. Remains to be seen if Bernal can achieve that coming from an injury. Wouldn't be the first talent who faded.

Not many I can say :lol:

Turned us down so many times only to join Arsenal now? That’s a shame.

Jesus, give the man a break. Vacate the thread.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that!

I doubt David would turn out to be a solution long term, but it would be stupid for us to miss on him. Especially if we're not going after another striker and I suppose we're not. Sesko seems promising but he's also work in progress. What price do you expect @FCBfan22, any rumours?

Should’ve come back with her. Seriously, sorry for Pep!

Herr Flick doesn’t lose in finals. Even outnumber.

That's not a matter of opinions. Harm claims are based on breaches of duty or wrongful acts defined in terms listed above. I didn't make those up. I also mentioned illegality which is not as narrow as fraud. But it's not the same logic since in the example I gave the court issued no provisional...

Sad to see him leave. Always liked the guy and hoped he’d stay.

The key difference is that while the employee worked legally during the provisional period, he wasn't hired legally. The provisional order was given to maintain the status quo until a final ruling but it didn't retroactively make the hiring legal. That's why compensation was awarded after the...

It was a joke, obviously. Didn't imply they could sue because he played, but because he played as a first team player. Of course they had no case. They'd have no case even without the fall back option. The Elche case is irrelevant, since we faced them after the provisional order was lifted...

Nope. You claim that if the final verdict rules against Barcelona, claims can be made retroactively for the provisional period because the order would be deemed "wrong". That's not how the law works. Provisional orders grant temporary rights to actions taken while the case is under review. Even...