Search results

When you want to figure who's the best player of the season, you don't just consider a specific subgroup of games, you have to look at the entire season. Edit: Just compared Zidane and Benitez's records. Both have had exactly 18 Lliga games so far this season - 15-2-1 for Zidane and 11-4-3 for...

If you consider only the games when he wasn't injured, Messi was the best. Otherwise, it's Benitez first, Suarez second, Ney/Busi third. Benitez basically fucked over Real's season. I don't remember the points gap between Barca and Real when he was sacked, but I think it was atleast 7-8...

What if the first option was changed to Barca winning La Liga?

lol no way. 3-0 was a deserved score line. In fact it should have been more. Bayern had that one Lewandowski chance but beyond that, nothing from them. Barca meanwhile had the clearest chance of the game (Suarez), two scoreable chances (Iniesta and Dani Alves) and a couple of other shots too...

Agreed. If you don't have intensity, you are out.

It could have been a quiet birthday party at home. PS: Neymar is also too old to be using Snapchat ffs. Teens are the only people who actually use the app in a regular basis.

JamDav1982, you are too old for Snapchat mate :D Snapchat messages are deleted every day (if they are public like Neymar's) or immediately after they are read (if you're sending to friends).

I second this. Please Bojan :D

Look mate, as most people already knew, I was obviously trolling - but now I have to genuinely disagree with you. The reason Xavi and Iniesta made the Ballon D'Or top 5 is because they are all-time great players and they played at their peak in those years, not because Messi brought them into...

Pretty sure Barca and Madrid's scoring rates hadn't reduced in the periods when Messi and Ronaldo were injured. Looking at average goals per game for the league and comparing it to previous years is not enough. You need to look at the standard deviations too. Yes, it's definitely easier for the...

The truth deserves to be shared. That post really resonated with me :coffee: Agenda? Tf :lol: What does the one have to do with the other? Yes, ofc talent wise Messi is better than Ronaldo. Not really any doubt in that after you see his passing and dribbling. But this discussion is about...

Ahh yes, because I really should care about the opinion of someone who makes personal attacks over disagreements with strangers on the internet :lol:

Iniesta still plays and Neymar-Suarez is a decent substitute for Xavi-Iniesta. How lucky is Messi that he gets to play with a gazillion World Cup-and multi-European Championship winners, one of the top talents the greatest football country in the world (Brazil) has ever produced and one of (if...

I like how you all resort to the trolling argument when you can't explain away Messi's failures (and success when put in the right context) :lol:

Easy to get lucky a few times when you're playing with all-time great players (Xavi, Iniesta, Alves, Puyol, Busquets) and two of the best players in the world (Neymar and Suarez). Check out the Ballon d'Or podium whenever he won it: 2009: 1. Messi, 2. Ronaldo, 3. Xavi, 4. Iniesta 2010: 1...

I agree. I don't think his kms will be any different. All it means is that he's very adept at stat-padding nowadays but when it comes to actually good defensive teams whom the ref doesn't decide to fuck over, he can't do shit.

So he magically wasn't tired today despite not having any rest over the past few weeks :rofl1:

Well, if they do end up losing the league, then it will have been the worst choke I've seen in a long time in football. So even the biggest mega-meltdown would be justified :lol:

Well, clearly we have different definitions for collapse then. If I say Barca's La Liga fight has collapsed, its implied that they dont have a chance anymore. But they do, in fact they have the best chance of all teams. Did you see how many chances they created today?! Madrid are not gonna win...

The league is not lost yet, still leading and favorites for the title - so its not a collapse. You need to lose something for it to be a collapse