Search results

Everything that he said has been said by us into a lot more detail. His blog article is chump change compared to our discussion.

1

its more so the case for bringing barcelona and real down, not improving the state of the liga. why? sevilla and villarreal are not going to earn more than they do because 5% and 4% is going to remain regardless. they are more annoyed with why barcelona and real earn so much. one thing that...

fashion is so underrated to be honest. are european girls also not big on makeup as much as they are in NA?

i want to rip my nuts off for not going to see messi. i came to know about it so late :(

bojan is justin bieber part 2

you pick up dresses for your successful woman.... i dont know what to say.

its true. behind every successful man, there is a woman that picks his clothes.

pep is not a hipster. i would never put dressing well and hipster together.

Yep. Club popularity, which dictates how many times a viewer wants to see their game is nicely termed into facilities fees. Here's the breakdown of the deal Its not really that much fair cause top club will get 80m pounds a season and relegation fighters will make 39m pounds. Barcelona and...

Thank you. But yeah, EPL doesnt share it equally either. It only shares 50% of domestic and 100% of international rights equally. Rest are based on popularity and performance-- favoring big clubs. Also, its not like you are giving to money to someone responsible because responsible people dont...

thank you. good to see this. i certainly dont want to see the massive loss of players that would come with the decrease of 110m.

Hey Irv, how do you explain to a village idiot that a loss of 110m Euros (approx 22% of their operating budget) is something that Real and Barcelona would accept so that they can take one for the team? I wonder if he even gives 22% of his own net income to a charity in order to benefit the less...

I agree with you. Especially your point regarding other clubs. http://www.elpais.com/articulo/deportes/bipartidismo/dispara/Liga/elpepidep/20110831elpepidep_2/Tes Here is a very good article regarding the points that we have made.

Thank you Irvin. Arguments here calling for an equal share of TV money does not make any sense to me because they are asking Real and Barca to reduce their operating budgets by 100m, putting their domestic TV revenue/operating budget ratio to less than 0.1. Would that be fair for Real or Barca...

Are you genuinely being stupid or are stupid? You previously talked about the higher standard of life in England when compared to Spain and now you are bringing the opposite. There is something called purchasing power parity index to compare the purchasing power of money in two given...

You do realise that even EPL clubs dont do that. Wolves earned 30m and Man Utd got 51m so equitable balance would never occur. Also, the current TV deal is based on the basis of popularity hence At. Madrid and Valencia got the next 2 shares. Furthermore, if everyone doubled their TV revenues...

exactly, it HAS caused an inflation in salaries. those salaries mentioned were in the same time period so the point of reference is the same. I am not arguing with you anymore because you are failing to grasp economics of football. Smaller clubs in England are not richer because you are not...

I am not going to argue with you when you are talking absolute shit. Instead, I am going to give you numbers so you can actually know whats going on-- This is the current split of the La Liga revenue (2010)-- http://monchismen.wordpress.com/2010/12/28/la-liga/ las tablas 1. RM €140 million...

Have you seen the increase in the commercial revenues of Barcelona in the past 8 years? ITS SUBSTANTIAL allowing the club the club to make such mistakes. We used to waste the SAME amount of money on Overmars/Petit/Christanval/Saviola but it didnt matter before because we had shit commercial...