Search results

exactly. alot of people on this forum only believe what suits them.

liverpool have nothing to prove. 65m or 75m it doesn't matter. it's barca who have to prove they got a bargain and dodge FFP. the 75m clasuse was reported as early as oct 2013 when his new contract was signed

on this day, 10 years ago. how time flies

there's no delusion about it. every news outlet reported 75m and there was no reason to lower from the buyout clause. wouldn't be the first time barca lied about a transfer fee either.

@TonyBarretTimes · 23h Barca confirm Suarez's release clause was £75m but claim they paid £65m. Liverpool insist it was £75m. Anyone seen the receipt?! @Tony Barrett @TonyBarretTimes · 23h This nonsense is why it would be much better for everyone if there was transparency over transfer fees.

just to clear it up. i didn't say he was poor. he's actually not doing too badly; just not "class"

what are you watching? his just losing the ball over and over

so ur saying he is on the brink of signing a 5 year contract with liverpool?

i know nothing about this toddler but most his tweets are liverpool related. i like that.

saved. fap'd.

has to be assisted by iniesta has to be the winner

beauty

i'll have it tattoo'd frame by frame

from willian to ba and back to willian slowly walks it into the net

vermalean, matieu and agger are all LCBs. besides liverpool don't want song. even if we sell lucas i don't se us signing a midfielder.

i'd be sad if i had to play with aspas

very no