Search results

Definitely one of the better options. He has La Liga experience and isn't even that old, he's still 29.

Bayern can have all the agreements they want with PSG but if they don't pay Rabiot 10m signing-on bonus in addition to 10m annually, then he wont come. There is no way in hell Rabiot will lower his demands.

Can you explain what happened there?

As long as this doesn't effect our De Jong plans then I'm all for it. A midfield of Arthur (22 years old) - Rabiot (23) - De Jong (21) is a scary thought for other teams for the next decade. However, if this means abandonning our De Jong plans then Rabiot and the board can go fuck themselves.

Why is it hard for people to understand that players who don't succeed in Barca can succeed elsewhere. Denis Suarez would be a good signing for any team not competing to win the Champions League.

He barely played this season. You cant write off a player after a few mistakes. He had a decent world cup, and is relatively experienced for his age. I think his problem is not lack of quality but more lack of confidence. A bit like Gomes and Paco where the quality was clear, but both were short...

I'm so glad we're actually thinking about him. I already mentioned in October how we should go for him. He can work as both short-term and long-term solution.

No club would be willing to pay him his demands then, and like many before him he will be happy with getting his pay cheque while rotting on Barcas bench. You just know how this deal is going to end up for us.

Changing his number from 8 to 6 would just add unnecessary pressure on him to perform like Xavi. Sign de Jong and give him #6 ;)

His second goal reminded me so much of this one The power he can generate in his headers from these situations is incredible and it's a rare skill by itself

He has barely played for Chelsea this season and he wants out. I reckon we should go for him, he obviously isn't in Sarris plans. If Chelsea aren't interested in selling, they will probably want to loan him until the remainder of the season which can be a short-term solution for our defence. De...

When asked who he would choose between Barcelona and Manchester City, he said Ajax. Then he was asked which city he would rather visit between Barcelona and Manchester, he said Barcelona because he likes the sun.

Never thought I would enjoy watching a defensive midfielder other than Busquets. This guy is must buy.

He scored in: UCL R16 vs City (Home and Away) UCL QF vs Dortmund (Home and Away) UCL SF vs Juve UCL GS vs Bayern UCL GS vs Liverpool WC QF vs Argentina WC Final vs Croatia And he's not even 20 yet :lol:

The worst part about this is had we signed Mbappe in 2017, he wouldn't get 10 starts under Valverde during the whole season. This is how conservative our manager is.

For what it's worth I don't think he's a die-hard Madridista but just a C.Ronaldo fanboy, he probably grew out of that phase. Also if Barca went for him last summer he wouldn't cost 180m, obviously we could've gotten him cheaper since we were capable of paying his fee that summer instead of...

For a lot of people it was crystal clear Mbappe was going to be better. Mbappe always looked like a once in a generation talent, similar to how Messi or Brazilian Ronaldo emerged to the scene and propably even more impressive. However, that doesn't mean that he will reach Messi's heights.

Looks like someone forgot Parejo and Di Maria

That's wrong. Serious reports linking PSG with Mbappe only emerged after the Neymar deal was sealed, not before. If anything Barca had an advantage in the race to sign him since we werent restricted by any FFP, but our board only had two names on their minds; Coutinho and Dembele.

Emery said a few months ago that Mbappe wanted to join Madrid or Barca, before he convinced him that he should stay in France