sadly talent in Sane case is not enough; am glad he is gone and I was a big fan of the transfer from city
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Luis Diaz
- Thread starter Andresito
- Start date
this Leroy is long long goneTrue
Don't get me wrong, I do rate Diaz. But I would rather have a fit, available, fully motivated, prime Sane, even if he disappointed at times too. Feel the upside is higher. He could also play both sides.
However, as you say, a fit and available and motivated Sane is a pipedream, so better to bring in a player who is hungry and always available. Like they say, the best ability is availability (though you don't want a rubbish player who is always ready to play either as that is pointless).
damn anglosaxon,you sure you watch PL; Diaz had his best season last year
He scored more goals than previous seasons but he was part of a side that dominated the league. I watched him every week, and most weeks he flattered to decieve.
A fantastic bit of business for Liverpool to get close to 80 million for him. They've already got a 16 year old that will replace him. Cope better.
oh but I have anglosaxon, hell I worked for a long time in Munich
Of course you did little man. Of course 😂
it was 70M and liverpool fans dont agree with you, go to their forum and readHe scored more goals than previous seasons but he was part of a side that dominated the league. I watched him every week, and most weeks he flattered to decieve.
A fantastic bit of business for Liverpool to get close to 80 million for him. They've already got a 16 year old that will replace him. Cope better
ha ha ha, little man, oh this anglosaxons are somethingOf course you did little man. Of course 😂
it was 70M and liverpool fans dont agree with you, go to their forum and read
Most the Liverpool fans on the official forum haven't been to Anfield in their lives ffs.
Regardless, people have different opinions. But it would be madness to not take 75 million for a 29 year old that would be worth half of that in less than a couple of years time when his contract was up. Bayern would never have looked at him if they had signed Wirtz, who after all chose Liverpool over them. So Liverpool signed a better player with his best years ahead of him and sold a lesser player who's best years are behind him. Give it 6 months and Luis Diaz's Father will be in the media trying to tout him to Barcelona.
But the fact that diaz was on very low wages (4 million in total gross per year) made him a very cheap option for liverpool on the LW position so it is important to get a high fee. For example ekitike is on 10 million gross if we mention him as an substitute. So luiz diaz would cost 4+8(50/6 amortisation) per year while ekitike costs 10+13 amortisation if he has a 6 year deal. So his sub is much more expensive but also younger. My own opinion is that Ekitike will flop like many of these strikers from the Bundesliga because the defense in German teams is very bad.Most the Liverpool fans on the official forum haven't been to Anfield in their lives ffs.
Regardless, people have different opinions. But it would be madness to not take 75 million for a 29 year old that would be worth half of that in less than a couple of years time when his contract was up. Bayern would never have looked at him if they had signed Wirtz, who after all chose Liverpool over them. So Liverpool signed a better player with his best years ahead of him and sold a lesser player who's best years are behind him. Give it 6 months and Luis Diaz's Father will be in the media trying to tout him to Barcelona.
So it is a good deal for liverpool but it is not the greatest deal ever
Edit: i thik the 80-95 million deal for frankfurt is much better than diaz. In contrast julian alvarez was also as expensive but is world champion and a better striker (i think better than haaland also) so atletico made a great deal
he he, you went from 80 to 75, in next post you willl be correct. You do understand Wirtz was x2 the price which Bayern would have never paid.Most the Liverpool fans on the official forum haven't been to Anfield in their lives ffs.
Regardless, people have different opinions. But it would be madness to not take 75 million for a 29 year old that would be worth half of that in less than a couple of years time when his contract was up. Bayern would never have looked at him if they had signed Wirtz, who after all chose Liverpool over them. So Liverpool signed a better player with his best years ahead of him and sold a lesser player who's best years are behind him. Give it 6 months and Luis Diaz's Father will be in the media trying to tout him to Barcelona.
Home of Barca Fans
