A loan sounds like it's something cheap but in this case it's not, it's very expensive for FPP with the huge salary that we gave to Rashford.
It's gonna be a shitshow with Laporta and Tebas again.
The first thing to ask is why FFP only accounts 20% of a transfer fee towards FFP. That effectively amortizes a big transfer fee to five years, and an austerity measure that shrinks investment.
If had sold Araujo for 60m, then only 12m would count towards FFP of the fee.
Regards to Rashford it is 14m FFP mass for one year only. That should not be a big issue in functional terms. In England we have Liverpool generating 600m / year and spending 300m in transfers. Right now in Spain we have a Stadium less Barcelona generating 900m in the year and unable to register 25m + wages amortizing over 6 years + a 14m wage without transfer fee.
I thought the FFP rules were relaxed but clearly it only works for two parties. Madrid who wanted to invest and already held a high salary margin, or Atleti who are diluting share value with capital increases, which somehow count as income while VIP seat sales do not.
But anyways back to us, the board just needed to be more modest and say that priority is financing the return to Camp Nou as quick as possible and transfers will need to be in check until then as LaLiga rules are counter productive to both investments simultaniously.
Not sell hot smoke that we could get a 60m+ player like Nico or Diaz while reality is Rashford is going to push us to our limit to register.