1? - Lamine Yamal

Maradona37

Well-known member
These 5 vs these 5, who wins? @Maradona37 🤔🤔🤔
View attachment 13474
That isn't even a debate :lol:

The technical ability and genius of those players is infinitely greater than all the Cristiano Ronaldo versions. And he's never even been impressive for Portugal, Juve, and his time as a kid at Sporting is meaningless.

But I know you're just trolling lol. Might as well ask if the 5 best versions of me can beat Pele, Di Stefano, Beckenbauer, Garrincha and Georgie Best. It's about as likely ie zero chance in both cases.
 

Fati_Future_BallonDor

Well-known member
That isn't even a debate :lol:

The technical ability and genius of those players is infinitely greater than all the Cristiano Ronaldo versions. And he's never even been impressive for Portugal, Juve, and his time as a kid at Sporting is meaningless.

But I know you're just trolling lol. Might as well ask if the 5 best versions of me can beat Pele, Di Stefano, Beckenbauer, Garrincha and Georgie Best. It's about as likely ie zero chance in both cases.

A post which you can only dislike 👎👎👎
 

Maradona37

Well-known member
No personal insults pls, there are no proves about that 😬

Anyways, lets dont go off topic here...
Yeah that was a bit harsh.

Obviously you overrate Ronaldo, but I know you aren't the type to defend him if it was proved it's true. Others would but not you as you are a decent guy.

It doesn't change though that those 5 Ronaldos against those players wouldn't be a contest. Also because the 5 Ronaldos would be a worse team with far worse link up than those Barca 10s.
 

jormatar

Member
No personal insults pls, there are no proves about that 😬

Anyways, lets dont go off topic here...

You don't pay 400,000 to random woman if you know you are innocent to the allegations.
 

Fati_Future_BallonDor

Well-known member

You don't pay 400,000 to random woman if you know you are innocent to the allegations.

Bro you should know 400.000 for CR7 is like 0.10€ for us, he was probably just annoyed from future rumours and prevent them 😬
 

serghei

Senior Member
It's common to pay money to avoid scandals for rich athletes. The "hush money" didn't prove jack shit.

He said-she said thing, impossible to prove, but logic dictates this is a type of case where woman tries to get rich. The fact that she got paid goes in that direction also.

If she didn't take a cent... and gone forward with the case... things would have looked differently.
 

Maradona37

Well-known member
It's common to pay money to avoid scandals for rich athletes. The "hush money" didn't prove jack shit.

He said-she said thing, impossible to prove, but logic dictates this is a type of case where woman tries to get rich. The fact that she got paid goes in that direction also.

If she didn't take a cent... and gone forward with the case... things would have looked differently.
This is pathetic and why plenty of women are scared to speak up.
 
Last edited:

mc_lovin

Senior Member
It's common to pay money to avoid scandals for rich athletes. The "hush money" didn't prove jack shit.

He said-she said thing, impossible to prove, but logic dictates this is a type of case where woman tries to get rich. The fact that she got paid goes in that direction also.

If she didn't take a cent... and gone forward with the case... things would have looked differently.

He's guilty as fuck. No he said-she said thing.
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top