Ozil vs Fabregas?

Who is better?


  • Total voters
    45
B

BrianSwan

Guest
Have Arsenal upgraded in their midfield department the past 2 years, who is the better player?
 

DonAndres

Wild Man of Borneo
Let's compare qualities:

Ozil
-Better Dribbler
-Better Freekicks
-Better on Counterattacks
-More mobile
-Inconsistent
-Low stamina

Cesc
-Better vision
-Better final pass
-Better in buildup play
-Better goalscorer
-Possibly inconsistent


Gotta give it to Cesc here, though they're not far off from each other.
 

Ursegor

World Champion
Let's compare qualities:

Ozil
-Better Dribbler
-Better Freekicks
-Better on Counterattacks
-More mobile
-Inconsistent
-Low stamina

Cesc
-Better vision
-Better final pass
-Better in buildup play
-Better goalscorer
-Possibly inconsistent


Gotta give it to Cesc here, though they're not far off from each other.

Strange observation. Özil is certainly more agile and I don't know if that makes him look more mobile but in no way is he more mobile than Fabregas. The areas on the pitch which Özil covers are rather small. Typical #10, playing right behind the striker. Fabregas also excells further forward but he's not a pure #10 like Özil. He does much more midfield work. The best example I can give is this: If Manchester United bought Fabregas he could have played behind RvP but also further back alongside Carrick. If MU had bought Özil he could have only played behind RvP. Which is why United never showed interest in Özil but tried to get Fabregas.

Fabregas' heatmap against Valencia:

BTGipIKIgAAmjic.jpg


Özil's heatmap over 3 seasons at Madrid.

mesutoziltouchesheatmap_640x360.jpg


I also don't think Özil is a much better dribbler. Certainly not good enough a dribbler like Iniesta to attribute "dribbling" as a big plus for him. Özil averaged 1 dribble per game last season. Fabregas is about the same (0.8). Fabregas' dribbling just looks awkward whereas Özil looks silky. The end result is about the same though.


Better freekicks? Not so sure about that either. I remember Fabs being a set piece specialist at Arsenal. At Barca he just doesn't take any. He took 1 in pre-season and hit the post. A minor point anyway. Not worth mentioning if one scores 2 or 3 more goals via freekicks than the other. Assisting via freekicks is almost impossible at Barca anyway given the team's height issues.

And while we're at it. I also doubt that Özil is much better at counterattacks than Fabs. Fabs never had the luxury to play in a pure Mourinho counterattacking team behind Ronaldo, Benzema / Higuain and Di Maria running into space. The closest thing he had were Bendtner, Adebayor, Walcott etc. and he still created as much as Özil if not more. Fabregas in Real Madrid's 11 / 12 team would have racked up 40+ assists probably. lol

Lost a bit of prestige after joining Barca and becoming Xaviesta's bitch while Özil got the full exposure of the Madrid marketing machinery as their second best player. Nevertheless, always been the superior player. Ketoth will agree with me. :pep:
 

Hamzah

High Definition Member
Scezny is a starter for arsenal in recent years, while Casillas isn't? Iker is still the better keeper though. The same thing applies here.

Ursegor summed it up quite well.
 
A

Athletic

Guest
Scezny is a starter for arsenal in recent years, while Casillas isn't? Iker is still the better keeper though. The same thing applies here.

Ursegor summed it up quite well.

....

How is that a good comparisson lol? Diego Lopez is performing better than Iker, hence why he starts. Sczesney is Arsenal's best keeper, hence why he starts.
Xavi starts ahead of Cesc despite being old and unfit. Not to mention when he was playing he was pretty often criticised for his performances.

Yet somehow he's better than a player that has been topping the assist chart for club and country for years.

And Cesc and Iniesta are the only players I like at Barca nowadays, so yeah...
 

Home of Barca Fans

Top