However, Messi and his representatives are making a different argument. They claim that the calendar of the 2019-20 season was disfigured by the COVID-19 pandemic and as such, the clause should be allowed to be triggered at the end of the playing season. Barcelona?s campaign, which would ordinarily end in May, instead finished when they exited the Champions League in Lisbon on August 14.
On the evening of Tuesday, August 25, Messi?s representatives informed Barcelona by burofax that he wished to leave the club and would now invoke the clause. Over the past week, Manchester City, Inter Milan, Paris Saint-Germain and Manchester United have all been credited with an interest in signing the forward, although City firmly lead the way.
It leaves Barcelona, declared the world?s richest club by Deloitte earlier this year, in a public war with arguably the greatest footballer of all time. There is a fierce dispute over whether the clause can be legally invoked. This tension is heightened because, should Messi be deemed to be in breach of contract by joining another club for free, a legal battle could then ensue and Messi could be liable to pay ?700 million to Barcelona. In addition to a potential nine-figure battle in court, FIFA?s sanctions could, in the worst-case scenario, land Messi with a ban from playing football and the hiring club with a ban from signing players for two transfer windows.