João Laporta

Luftstalag14 said:

The right thing to do to publicly rejecting the CVC deal and even go to the length of suing them while privately negotiating with them (if true)? Respectfully disagreed.

I will applaud him if he continues to reject the CVC deal both publicly and privately.

Click to expand...

Luftstalag14 said:

The right thing to do to publicly rejecting the CVC deal and even go to the length of suing them while privately negotiating with them (if true)? Respectfully disagreed.

I will applaud him if he continues to reject the CVC deal both publicly and privately.

Click to expand...

khaled_a_d said:

How do you know they aren't the one negotiating with us privately?
Do you think in such case we should shut them down rather than listen to what they have to say?

Click to expand...

iniestaGOAT said:

Don't be stupid. He rejected the first deal, negations are taking place. First we sign the cvc deal then we sigj halaand.

Click to expand...

Luftstalag14 said:

Don't be stupid, he rejected the one and only CVC deal which encompasses all La Liga Primera and Segunda clubs and he is suing them along with Real Madrid and Athletic Bilbao as they believe the deal is illegal. Now he is negotiating with CVC separately (confirmed by Tebas today).

CVC is not going to help us get Haaland, don't be so naive.

Click to expand...

FinBarcelonafan said:

What does it help then? If it doesn't help anything why bother even negoating?

Click to expand...

JamDav1982 said:

CVC deal is counted as income otherwise would have made no difference to Messi signing.

The issue with Messi was the accounts and league rules not a lack of cash otherwise they would have signed him on back of a loan.

Click to expand...

Luftstalag14 said:

The logic makes sense but I haven't been able to find any sources to confirm that CVC money that will be distributed to clubs is considered income.

I doubt it because even owner's injection of money into the club is not counted as income (Atletico's and Espanyol's recent ones for example). Why would CVC's be different, not to mention they are a loan essentially?

Click to expand...

khaled_a_d said:

Owners investing is actually counted in salary cap. That was confirmed before.
And Tebas has said countless of times that we could renewed Messi with CVC deal.
CVC will allow us to get Halaand, and that is why Tebas is opening his mouth again.

Click to expand...

Luftstalag14 said:

Do you have the sources for this, Khaled?

That is some creative accounting if true, I must say.

Click to expand...

FinBarcelonafan said:

I think Atletico owners added money, so they could keep their players or buy some players (like Griezmann).

It adds money to the salary cap.

Sadly Barca can't do the same unless all the socios would give a few million?

Click to expand...

Luftstalag14 said:

If that's really true, doesn't it defeat the purpose of FFP? Basically owners, whether they are states, oil, real estate or financial tycoons from anywhere in this world can just pump money into the clubs they own and inflate their income/revenues, so they can up their spending power/cap accordingly, as a result, right?

Click to expand...

Luftstalag14 said:

If that's really true, doesn't it defeat the purpose of FFP? Basically owners, whether they are states, oil, real estate or financial tycoons from anywhere in this world can just pump money into the clubs they own and inflate their income/revenues, so they can up their spending power/cap accordingly, as a result, right?

Click to expand...

Luftstalag14 said:

If that's really true, doesn't it defeat the purpose of FFP? Basically owners, whether they are states, oil, real estate or financial tycoons from anywhere in this world can just pump money into the clubs they own and inflate their income/revenues, so they can up their spending power/cap accordingly, as a result, right?

Click to expand...