User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29

Thread: Too Much Revisionism

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Messigician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    12,932
    Mentioned
    119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Too Much Revisionism

    Everyone is acting like Rosell and Nike were here to destroy FC Barcelona lol. Let's be adults here and actually talk about that.

    First up Rosell I won't go through a history lesson of his time with Laporta but he was always in favor of keeping Pep and Unicef as sponsors now his Nike connection was key.

    Ronaldinho signed for Barcelona instead of the Premier League Champions because of his friendship with Rosell, a former Nike executive in Brazi

    Neymar signed for Barcelona depsite being a Real Madrid fan and turning down larger wages at Madrid due to Rosell and Cury's Brazilian connection.

    Always turned a healthy profit for the club after Laporta's heavy debt, now let's look at the transfers.

    Neymar Excellent
    Cesc F?bregas Good
    Alexis S?nchez Good
    Javier Mascherano Excellent
    Alex Song Bad
    Jordi Alba Excellent
    1Brazil Adriano Ok

    Overall pretty gold considering the prices spent could argue bargains.

    Pretty good overall.

    Now Bartoemu public enemy number 1 Lol

    First season won a treble; and probably best signings in history of club

    Suarez
    Bravo
    MATS
    Rakitic
    Etc

    Now overall his term has been mixed, problems began after sacking Valverde who was keeping a declining squad competitive


    Coutinho (145 million euros)*. Disaster

    - Demb?l? (130)*. Awful

    - Griezmann (120). Awful

    - De Jong (75)*. Excellent

    - Pjanic (60). Awful

    - Malcom (41). Bad

    - Paulinho (40). Excelelent

    - Andr? Gomes (37). Bad but good effort made for money

    - Lenglet (35.9). Ok

    - Semedo (35.7). Awful

    - Arda Turan (34). Awful

    - Trincao (31). Bad

    - Arthur (31). Awful

    - Paco Alc?cer (30). Ok

    - Neto (26). Ok

    - Umtiti (25). Bad but was a bargain before knee issue

    - Dest (21). Ok? Might come good

    - Junior (18). Bad

    - Braithwaite (18). Ok squad player

    - Arturo Vidal (18). Great but could have done better

    - Aleix Vidal (17). Awful

    - Digne (16,5). Good profit and did fine

    - Cillessen (13). Good profit

    - Deulofeu (12). Ok not much profit

    - Emerson (12). Ok not much profit

    - Yerry Mina (11.8). Awful cost us unbeaten season despite profit

    - Matheus Fernandes (7). Awful

    - Pedri (5). Excellent

    - Marlon (5). Ok

    - Cucurella (4). Good sold for profit

    - Denis Su?rez (3.25). Ok

    - Murillo (1.2) Bad

    - Todibo (1). Good sold for profit

    - Kevin Prince Boateng (1). Awful


    Overall bad sporting direction with transfers but good revenue made until Covid, lots of trophies won but allowed team to decline and made the self admitted mistake of sacking Valverde for Setien and starting out downfall from the top

    Overall not the best but not a complete disaster let's be real

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    serghei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Forum de Amigos - Tactical Ops. Office
    Posts
    33,574
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The biggest problem at Barca is that if a new board comes after a successful one, they feel this urge to destroy everything that happened before just because that legacy belonged to "the enemy". That kind of politics is the biggest enemy of this club. Rossell and Barto had absolutely no reason to attack anything that had to do with Barca's golden era that preceded them. But they still felt the need to attack the previous establishment to make their mark. And they failed royally.

    I don't care what everyone says or what kind of half-baked rubbish sources they indicate. Pep left because he couldn't stand dealing with Rosell & Barto sleazy presidents, the archetype "chip on their shoulder" types looking to make their big entry. 2011 was the inertia of the Laporta era and the connections set at the time. As soon as 2012 came and Rossell started to impact things, shit hit the fan and the club went downhill fast. We keep Guardiola in the club and we win probably a minimum of 5 CLs in 10 years. At a minimum. I suspect more, maybe 6 is not out of reach. He won 2 in 4 years with some immense bad luck, another 3 in a decade is not far fetched in the slightest. You really think Pep handling MSN Barca would have allowed Madrid to make a threepeat .

    Barto and Rosell fucked everything up. Guardiola and Barca were a match made in heaven. Criminal that it lasted 4 mere fucking years, for both parties. We lost the most elite manager, and he lost the best platform for his brand of football. You have the best manager in the fucking world and you lose him because of your ego...

    Guardiola, Tito, Tata, Lucho, EV, Setien, Koeman. What the fuck. Recipe for disaster. It's like you start from 10/10 and you gradually end up with 5/10.
    Last edited by serghei; 7th September 2021 at 09:36 PM.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Messigician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    12,932
    Mentioned
    119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by serghei View Post
    The biggest problem at Barca is that if a new board comes after a successful one, they feel this urge to destroy everything that happened before just because that legacy belonged to some other board. That kind of politics are the biggest enemy of this club. Rossell and Barto had absolutely no reason to attack anything that had to do with Barca's golden era that preceded them. But they still felt they need to attack the previous establishment to make their mark. And they failed royaly.

    I don't care what everyone says or what kind of half-baked rubbish sources they indicate. Pep left because he couldn't stand dealing with Rosell & Barto types. We kee Guardiola in the club and we win probably a minimum of 5 CLs in 10 years. Minimum.

    Pep didn't leave because of that lol Rosell bend over backwards to keep him.

    Same with Bayern but no manager is above the club until man city where pep has a blank cheque and can forge his legacy.

    EVEN STILL! Pep is set to leave and coach a national team he also is adamant he will never coach here again even with Laporta

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    serghei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Forum de Amigos - Tactical Ops. Office
    Posts
    33,574
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Messigician View Post
    Pep didn't leave because of that lol Rosell bend over backwards to keep him.

    Same with Bayern but no manager is above the club until man city where pep has a blank cheque and can forge his legacy.

    EVEN STILL! Pep is set to leave and coach a national team he also is adamant he will never coach here again even with Laporta
    You are a child believing Pep's bullshit PR reasons. Everyone with a brain knows Pep left because he didn't like working with a board he had no connection with. At City he has control, and voila, he spends more time than at Barca even though he didn't have even half the success.

    Rosell and Bartomeu took the club and driven it into a galactico model to make them the heroes for assembling a stellar team. They were on a mission to cut ties from the Laporta golden era to "establish" their own legacy. Their whole agenda was making the club success seem their masterplan, THEIR master plan, not the manager's work. Laporta was less vain, he didn't have a problem with the fact that Guardiola took most of the laurels for the dream team being created, after all HE WAS the biggest piece of the puzzle (not like some clueless fans think that it was all Messi). It's basically Rosell and later Bartomeu trying to impersonate the Galactico Florentino era of 2000-2004.

    Pep had such a big aura that Rosell was 2nd fiddle at the time. That was unacceptable. Of course, they had no chance in the public eye going to war with the greatest manager in the club's history so they undermined him silently by veto-ing his options. The 2012 moment needed squad changes. It's a key moment in time where you either vouch for the manager and go with his judgment, or you cut him loose and look to build your own thing. The cycle was coming to an end, so if the board is blocking the rebuild, the manager has no choice but to go somewhere where he does have control over his own team.
    Last edited by serghei; 7th September 2021 at 09:48 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Messigician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    12,932
    Mentioned
    119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by serghei View Post
    You are a child believing Peps' bullshit PR reasons. Everyone with a brain knows Pep left because he didn't like working with a board he had no connection with.
    Then why didn't he return when Laporta asked him to

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    serghei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Forum de Amigos - Tactical Ops. Office
    Posts
    33,574
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Messigician View Post
    Then why didn't he return when Laporta asked him to
    It's a bit tough to come back now. Although I do hold a grudge against him for not coming back. I don't like Pep as a person. Same with Messi. I really don't like them, I find them fake to extremes, but on the field, they are brilliant, despite their flaws.

  7. #7
    Senior Member

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    29,106
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by serghei View Post
    You are a child believing Pep's bullshit PR reasons. Everyone with a brain knows Pep left because he didn't like working with a board he had no connection with. At City he has control, and voila, he spends more time than at Barca even though he didn't have even half the success.

    Rosell and Bartomeu took the club and driven it into a galactico model to make them the heroes for assembling a stellar team. They were on a mission to cut ties from the Laporta golden era to "establish" their own legacy. Their whole agenda was making the club success seem their masterplan, THEIR master plan, not the manager's work. Laporta was less vain, he didn't have a problem with the fact that Guardiola took most of the laurels for the dream team being created, after all HE WAS the biggest piece of the puzzle (not like some clueless fans think that it was all Messi). It's basically Rosell and later Bartomeu trying to impersonate the Galactico Florentino era of 2000-2004.

    Pep had such a big aura that Rosell was 2nd fiddle at the time. That was unacceptable. Of course, they had no chance in the public eye going to war with the greatest manager in the club's history so they undermined him silently by veto-ing his options. The 2012 moment needed squad changes. It's a key moment in time where you either vouch for the manager and go with his judgment, or you cut him loose and look to build your own thing. The cycle was coming to an end, so if the board is blocking the rebuild, the manager has no choice but to go somewhere where he does have control over his own team.
    Pep left for the reasons he gave and there is no PR involved. There has not been a 'galactico' model. You seem to use that word without knowing what Real Madrid did.

    Coaches dont last long at Barca and lasted about as long if not longer than he predicted at the start.

    City is completely different and he may well have left there by now had he wont everything there was to win in first season and a couple CLs.

    The idea to cut from Laporta was not there as much as made out and Pep was given almost full control and as much as he was previously.

    Rosell was desperate for Pep to stay and their was no rebuild blocked.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Birdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    3,233
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Messigician View Post
    Pep didn't leave because of that lol Rosell bend over backwards to keep him.

    Same with Bayern but no manager is above the club until man city where pep has a blank cheque and can forge his legacy.

    EVEN STILL! Pep is set to leave and coach a national team he also is adamant he will never coach here again even with Laporta
    He is adamant, because he took his decision back then, and now he wants to checklist the other goals he has in his mind...

    But, BACK THEN, despite being certain he will leave one day (because he is ambitious and wanted to prove himself elsewhere, unlike complacent Xavi nowadays) it was still open WHEN he will leave. He could have stayed 5,7, or even 8-9 years...
    He stayed only 4 fucking season at the club of his heart, and he has already completed 5, and on course for 7, at City, under the director of football and technical director he had at Barca BACK THEN (lol, do you realize that?)
    Why would he do that, when at City -despite all the blank cheques - he has a squad much inferior for the football he wants to teach compared to the squad he had back then at Barca??

    It does NOT make sense. All that is really BS, and not the real reason he left THEN.
    It's because under Rossell, he would not have the authority and full control on the dressing room, on making decisions like who will leave and who will stay..
    It's been leaked everywhere that he saw the complacency of the squad coming, and he wanted to perform sweeping changes
    Read Pique's recent interview, you will see that VERY VERY clearly

    Rossell is the prime reason Pep stayed 4 and not 6 or 8 years at Barca
    Get it straight

    PS: On Barto, it's not even debatable LOL
    Of course he is responsible for everything.
    For instilling the Galactico model that is historically proper to our biggest rival and not to Barca's culture and identity,
    for never investing on a top coach,
    for tolerating the Amigo power,
    for tolerating successive humiliations,
    but first and foremost for PURPOSEFULLY (I am not naive to believe he did all that unknowingly) drove the club financially to the ground
    Last edited by Birdy; 9th September 2021 at 11:23 PM.
    1992

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    serghei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Forum de Amigos - Tactical Ops. Office
    Posts
    33,574
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Anyway, to synthesize. 2012 and 2017 are absolute key moments in the rebuilding process, that could've impacted the present to an astonishing degree. Then 2019, post-Liverpool fiasco, was also a big moment. All 3 moments were managed in a disastrous way by the board.

    2012 is the moment when we first sense the complacency settling in after a gorgeous era. An era with utter domination, unlike everything I've seen before or after. The team is just not as committed that year, not as hardworking as in the past. We are more careless, we care less about matching the opponent in terms of work rate, etc. I remember an Osasuna game 0-2 at halftime and outplayed, it was surreal, never experienced the team just walking on the pitch making errors left and right and not even reacting.

    Then Pep leaves and we appoint his assistant manager. Big mistake. Come on, Pep is such an obsessed perfectionist, that his assistant manager is never one with anything more than just a consultative role. Everything about that team was all Pep, tactically.

    We have a bad few years post Pep, relatively speaking since the domination under Pep was always going to last years at least domestically, with embarrassments like the 0-7 vs Bayern in 2013, with some valid excuses (Tito's illness, although with all due respect, Tito was not a top manager).

    Then we hit the jackpot with MSN, maybe the single best thing Barto did in all his time. Let's make this straight, MSN Barca was the dream child of Rosell/Bartomeu. This is what he envisioned (until he poetically lost Neymar and signed the worst follow-up acts in the history of sports: Dembele and Coutinho). But as it is with galactico models, they burn bright, but short. Lasted one year - give or take - before problems of unbalance started to set up, making Lucho (the best manager we had post Pep, I rate him a solid 7/10) leave at the end. He knew very well MSN Barca was very much a players' team where the manager was more or less expected to follow act, not decide the key points.

    Then we have an already heavily declining team, riddled with not-so-great transfers. And when the best players in a team are still the ones we had in 2009, almost a decade ago, Bartomeu names a submissive manager (enter EV), and makes the veterans basically the big shots inside the team (no wonder Pique has no shame admitting live they didn't value EV's input too much, he was sort of like the wise grandfather all respect but few obey in the end).

    At this point, the chance of a seamless rebuild is already lost, so the present is pretty much a result of 3 bottled big decisions, all the courtesy of Rosell/Bartomeu. Not backing Pep's rebuild plan, not reacting after Lucho was hard done by complacency, and not even reacting after EV's fiasco vs Liverpool, at which point CL embarrassments started to be the norm, not the exception.

    So you botch the decision tied with the first sign of trouble, you both the decision at the 2nd big sign of trouble, and you also both the decision at the 3rd sign of trouble, at which point the house is already burning and everyone is laughing at you .
    Last edited by serghei; 7th September 2021 at 10:13 PM.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Messigician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    12,932
    Mentioned
    119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by serghei View Post
    Anyway, to synthesize. 2012 and 2017 are absolute key moments in the rebuilding process, that could've impacted the present to an astonishing degree. Then 2019, post-Liverpool fiasco, was also a big moment. All 3 moments were managed in a disastrous way by the board.

    2012 is the moment when we first sense the complacency settling in after a gorgeous era. An era with utter domination, unlike everything I've seen before or after. The team is just not as committed that year, not as hardworking as in the past. We are more careless, we care less about matching the opponent in terms of work rate, etc. I remember an Osasuna game 0-2 at halftime and outplayed, it was surreal, never experienced the team just walking on the pitch making errors left and right and not even reacting.

    Then Pep leaves and we appoint his assistant manager. Big mistake. Come on, Pep is such an obsessed perfectionist, that his assistant manager is never one with anything more than just a consultative role. Everything about that team was all Pep, tactically.

    We have a bad few years post Pep (with Tito and Tata, colorful names btw), with embarrassments like the 0-7 vs Bayern in 2013, with some valid excuses (Tito's illness, although with all due respect, Tito was not a top manager).

    Then we hit the jackpot with MSN, maybe the single best thing Barto did in all his time. Let's make this straight, MSN Barca was the dream child of Rosell/Bartomeu. This is what he envisioned (until he poetically lost Neymar and signed the worst follow-up acts in the history of sports: Dembele and Coutinho). But as it is with galactico models, they burn bright, but short. Lasted one year - give or take - before problems of unbalance started to set up, making Lucho (the best manager we had post Pep, I rate him a solid 7/10) resign at the end.

    Then we have an already heavily declining team, riddled with not-so-great transfers. And when the best players in a team are still the ones we had in 2009, almost a decade ago, Bartomeu names a submissive manager, enter EV and makes the veterans basically the big shots inside the team (no wonder Pique has no shame admitting live they didn't value EV's input too much, he was sort of like the wise grandfather all respect but few obey in the end).

    At this point, the chance of a seamless rebuild is already lost, so the present is pretty much a result of 3 bottled big decisions, all the courtesy of Rosell/Bartomeu. Not backing Pep's rebuild plan, not reacting after Lucho was hard done by complacency, and not even reacting after EV's fiasco vs Liverpool, at which point CL embarrassments started to be the norm, not the exception.
    Ok but what if Coutinho Griemann Dembele didn't flop

    Umtiti knee didn't collapse, Messi wasn't forced to leave because of Covid, FDJ as the Rakitic replacement was pretty good. Pedri signed by Barto too.

    Not a bad rebuild no?

    I don't think it's on Barto those 3 signings were such a disaster

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    serghei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Forum de Amigos - Tactical Ops. Office
    Posts
    33,574
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Messigician View Post
    Ok but what if Coutinho Griemann Dembele didn't flop

    Umtiti knee didn't collapse, Messi wasn't forced to leave because of Covid, FDJ as the Rakitic replacement was pretty good. Pedri signed by Barto too.

    Not a bad rebuild no?

    I don't think it's on Barto those 3 signings were such a disaster
    The galactico model is a bad one overall, especially when the ones implementing are Bartomeu types, not Florentino Perez (who also got burned in his first galactico stint because he lost control of his club). That's the biggest lesson here.

    Coutinho, Dembele, Griezmann. These are name signings. These are done purely by a board, with no input from the technical staff.

    Absolutely on Bartomeu without a doubt. The guy lost the plot after Neymar saga.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Messigician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    12,932
    Mentioned
    119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by serghei View Post
    The galactico model is a bad one overall, especially when the ones implementing are Bartomeu types, not Florentino Perez (who also got burned in his first galactico stint because he lost control of his club). That's the biggest lesson here.

    Coutinho, Dembele, Griezmann. These are name signings. These are done purely by a board, with no input from the technical staff.
    I mean people wanted Dembele over Neymar as he's a two footed high potential young player who did well for Dortmund.

    The market for wingers is dry,it's on Neymar for leaving us late in the window and clubs knowing we are loaded with cash and desperate for players.

    Coutinho was hyped as ready to step up and become a world class player and replace iniesta.

    Only Griezmann had serious doubts but even still he shouldn't have done as bad as he did for us

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    serghei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Forum de Amigos - Tactical Ops. Office
    Posts
    33,574
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Messigician View Post
    I mean people wanted Dembele over Neymar as he's a two footed high potential young player who did well for Dortmund.

    The market for wingers is dry,it's on Neymar for leaving us late in the window and clubs knowing we are loaded with cash and desperate for players.

    Coutinho was hyped as ready to step up and become a world class player and replace iniesta.

    Only Griezmann had serious doubts but even still he shouldn't have done as bad as he did for us
    Ah, I see this argument being paraded often.

    Let me tell you something. I, as a fan, can be excited over any signing, it doesn't cost me anything and it's not my neck on the line if that signing flops or not. It's not my job to analyze the success of a potential target. And to be frank, even with players I like, I rarely invest much in them in terms of analysis and documentation because I don't have the time to follow every Barca target. I'm not paid for it, nothing happens to me if that player fails or not. This is completely the opposite with a board member, a director of sports or any other person who's success or failure is decided by the quality of the transfers being made (among others).

    So, if fans liked Dembele or Coutinho, I don't care. It's irrelevant. Highly-paid professionals in the club are paid millions to make sure they analyze the players to a faaaaaar higher degree than some posters on a football forum who have jobs, families, and whole lives outside of the sport.
    Last edited by serghei; 7th September 2021 at 10:36 PM.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Xaviniesta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    4,502
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    how is messigician paying his bills ?

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Messigician's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    12,932
    Mentioned
    119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Xaviniesta View Post
    how is messigician paying his bills ?
    Government is paying me because of lockdown lol