I can't believe we still have users missing Valverde after the shitshow that was his last half season.
Doubt anyone wanted him to last to his 4th year, at worst people would have preferred if he completed his 3rd season, because despite the fact that his cycle was over he was still far superior option than Setien
I think people pointing out how people took what he achieved for granted. Since the glorified friendly aka super copa, he was the superior coach tactically during most classicos, only one I can think of that you can say he was out coached was his last classico, and even then he realized the tactics soon and reacted quickly and reached for safe result against superior side, something that the 2 coaches after him failed to even do.
The forum mentality has been "Messi wins us games" or "why he should take credit for winning Liga, we win it with any coach" etc. This was truly unfair to him, if you want to blame him for his failures (Liverpool/Roma) or esthetics of the game, that is fair. But people refused to even acknowledge his success and always said it was due to someone else
